On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 15:18, Sebastian Spiess wrote:
> I'm for using ref= or ref:xxx= as these would be references. Referencing
> or relating to the PSMA data set. I don't see comment as suitable when
> there is a reference tag for referencing identifiers.
>
If we use ref, then I feel it
On 19/9/20 3:58 pm, Warin wrote:
> On 17/9/20 11:40 am, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>> On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a
>>> reference, the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be
>>> more specific then ref:psma
On 17/9/20 11:40 am, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a
reference, the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be
more specific then ref:psma or something like that would work. No
need to
On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a reference,
the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be more specific
then ref:psma or something like that would work. No need to invent new
tags here when one already exists,
4 matches
Mail list logo