On 17/9/20 11:40 am, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a
reference, the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be
more specific then ref:psma or something like that would work. No
need to invent new tags here when one already exists, is well
documented and in widespread use.
I have been pondering this further and I'm wondering if these type of
maintenance tags would be more appropriate in the note namespace. So:
note:*=*
rather than
ref:*=*
as note=* is for information for other mappers.
Any thoughts/objections/counter proposals?
notes tend to be alerts for caution?
What about using comment:*=* as these tend to be informative, perhaps
too casual?
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au