If this [1] doesn't yield a response he is definitely over OSM.
[1] : https://twitter.com/jward101/status/437826150052552704
Cheers,
Jason
On 24 February 2014 15:37, Ross Scanlon wrote:
> On 24/02/14 12:01, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Bummer that you can't get in contact with morb_au
>
On 24/02/14 12:01, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Bummer that you can't get in contact with morb_au
Have you tried twitter?
A search there shows he's still around but possibly not really
interested in osm any more.
His first diary post gives a hint to the dis-interest.
Cheers
Ross
___
Ah goodo, sorry, my incorrect impression was that you hadn't seen that
page. Bummer that you can't get in contact with morb_au...But regardless, I
reckon the best solution would be to facilitate and encourage locals to
grab a MapCraft slice and merge the data in themselves by local
knowledge/survey
Thanks for that. I have read that several times and in fact link to it in
the Wiki page for this import (my prior email contains that link). That is
the clearest indication yet that I might need to rethink the existing
dataset.
> I would advise against removal of anything unless verified by sur
>
> My only requirement being to understand where the qroti:surveyed is from
> (a government employee survey date or a morb_au survey date?) My thinking
> is that morb_au didn't survey 6,000 bus stop across Brisbane and that this
> was information held in a dataset that he had access to.
>
This: h
Hi everyone,
I've been sporadically looking at the best way forward on this import and
am at a bit of a loose end. I am still to document the process for
importing but in doing so and monitoring the @imports list for a while now
one of their significant considerations is how best to maintain the
Hi everyone,
I took the discussion offline momentarily and Daniel and I have had a few
email exchanges. The result is a Wiki page with information about the
process. Anyone interested in helping with the import and QA process (both
documenting and doing) is more than welcome to go right ahead.
So, I might spend an hour or two generating a few .osm files with imported
data, so we can get an picture of what it looks like without doing an
import.
https://github.com/CloCkWeRX/data.gov.au-qconnect-gtfs is a quick repo I
added with all of the data extracted, and an initial.osm which shows eve
Hi Daniel,
Wow that is a lot. I looked at
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=qroti#keys and was considering
these as candidates for removal and replacement with the new gtfs data /
positioning.
I presume nodes tagged without these key:value tags would come under the
standard duplication c
> Bus stops sounds great although there is a stack load (thousands) of
> existing Brisbane Stops imported from a no longer accessible source (QROTI)
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/QROTI
> (Here is a quick example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/739929)
>
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1
Hi Daniel,
I'm creating a separate thread just so I can keep the data.qld.gov.au one
on-point with regards to my future plans for a whole of government explicit
permission request in 2014.
Bus stops sounds great although there is a stack load (thousands) of
existing Brisbane Stops imported from a
11 matches
Mail list logo
