Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-11 Thread Stéphane Guillou
Hi Tom I'll also add my voice here, as I've been working on "sidewalks" in my area as well: I agree with your summary. I try to add sidewalks for precise pedestrian routing (with safe crossing) and improved routing for wheelchair users (adding curb tags) and visually impaired users (adding

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-10 Thread Tom Brennan
Thanks for the feedback. Just to summarise my reading of the replies, it sounds like there is: 1. a preference for separately mapped sidewalks (highway=footway + footway=sidewalk) 2. no harm in also adding tags to the road (sidewalk:both=separate, or sidewalk:left=separate /

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-10 Thread Andrew Harvey
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 19:09, Benjamin Ceravolo wrote: > Why not sidewalk:both=separate? > Yeah if both sides are the same, then that's better. PS in case someone hasn't found it yet, JOSM has a map style called "Sidewalks and footways (with knobs on)" which helps visualising when editing.

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-10 Thread Benjamin Ceravolo
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 14:24, Andrew Harvey wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 13:00, Tom Brennan wrote: > >> I've been using the current lockdown to walk and cycle all of the >> streets of my LGA (Willoughby), and I've been checking back to OSM to >> see if there's anything needing updating. For

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-10 Thread Matthew Davalle
e: 1 > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:55:35 +1000 > From: Tom Brennan > To: OSM Australian Talk List > Subject: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia > Message-ID: <3da66230-5701-163c-c22c-e26e677bb...@ozultimate.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > I

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-09 Thread Andrew Harvey
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 13:00, Tom Brennan wrote: > I've been using the current lockdown to walk and cycle all of the > streets of my LGA (Willoughby), and I've been checking back to OSM to > see if there's anything needing updating. For the most part it's just > minor edits here and there. >

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-09 Thread Sam Wilson
I normally do separate ways, because it's easier to more accurately map the topology. I just pretend I'm pushing a wheelbarrow (or stroller or am using a wheelchair) and wonder what sort of connectivity and data I'd want to be able to navigate. For instance, it might be possible as you say

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-09 Thread osm.talk-au
and sidewalks, that way the sidewalks have a high level of connectivity with the road. From: Graeme Fitzpatrick Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2021 13:23 To: Tom Brennan Cc: OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 13:00, Tom Brennan

Re: [talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-09 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 13:00, Tom Brennan wrote: > > I'm not much of a fan of separately mapped sidewalks, because there tend > to be an infinite number of places you can walk/cross etc, and any > mapping fails to capture this. But I'm not too concerned with opening a > debate if it's already

[talk-au] Sidewalks in Australia

2021-08-09 Thread Tom Brennan
I've been using the current lockdown to walk and cycle all of the streets of my LGA (Willoughby), and I've been checking back to OSM to see if there's anything needing updating. For the most part it's just minor edits here and there. I had a couple of questions, one of which I'll address in