Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On Wednesday, 30 May 2018 6:10:54 PM AEST Jonathon Rossi wrote: > use of mailing lists it is common people forget to reply all. I use "Reply to List" - easy as pressing L. -- Regards Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://linuxcounter.net

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2018 19:17 To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland I quoted the whole off-list "discussion" with Thorsten. Since it was short and not controversial, I assumed it was in

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On 30/05/18 18:10, Jonathon Rossi wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:34 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: On 30/05/18 16:03, Jonathon Rossi wrote: I would say both of these should be mapped as bridges. Problem: Personal discussion being

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:34 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30/05/18 16:03, Jonathon Rossi wrote: > > I would say both of these should be mapped as bridges. >> > > Problem: Personal discussion being shown on public list.. > If you want more than the two of you to contribute then

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On 30/05/18 16:03, Jonathon Rossi wrote: I would say both of these should be mapped as bridges. Problem: Personal discussion being shown on public list.. If you want more than the two of you  to contribute then hold the discussion here. :) I'd like to, but the problem it causes is

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

> > I would say both of these should be mapped as bridges. > I'd like to, but the problem it causes is that trails in national parks and bushland are usually named, and MTB trails have other tags including difficulty ratings. By splitting these trails to add tiny bridges it makes it harder to

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

> > If you 'jump across it' I'd go for ford. Reason ... it is not a bridge, > nor a culvert both of which require infrastructure. > The ford to me give warning that I might get wet feet, and that if flooded > I may have to wait. > So that is the 'best fit' where the crossing has nothing other than

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On 30/05/18 02:26, Jonathon Rossi wrote: I finally got a response on the changeset, thanks for the pointer Warin. The response unfortunately isn't the clearest explanation of why fords were added when a ground survey wasn't performed since you can rarely see culverts from aerial imagery. > I

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

I finally got a response on the changeset, thanks for the pointer Warin. The response unfortunately isn't the clearest explanation of why fords were added when a ground survey wasn't performed since you can rarely see culverts from aerial imagery. > I have only ever mapped what is on the ground.

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

-- >> > I have been “guilty” of adding small fords and culverts on bush tracks > because JOSM gives me an error message if you have a waterway crossing a way > without some sort of bridge, Ford, etc - and I try to avoid doing

[talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

> > Hi, > > Lately a mapper has been adding heaps of fords in SE QLD bushland along > with more creeks/streams, however I've noticed quite a lot of the fords > aren't actually fords based on my local knowledge of the area. I tried > commenting on a changeset

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On 23/05/18 00:56, Jonathon Rossi wrote: Hi, Lately a mapper has been adding heaps of fords in SE QLD bushland along with more creeks/streams, however I've noticed quite a lot of the fords aren't actually fords based on my local knowledge of the area. I tried commenting on a changeset

[talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

Hi, Lately a mapper has been adding heaps of fords in SE QLD bushland along with more creeks/streams, however I've noticed quite a lot of the fords aren't actually fords based on my local knowledge of the area. I tried commenting on a changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58540304) 2