[talk-au] LPI sources, not the Base Map

Hi, I have come across a boundary between 2 state forests that are not shown on the LPI Base Map .. yet the source tag claims that is where it comes from. I think the source is the LPI admin boundary data .. and that is probably where they have come from. It is Way: 387068735, most of it

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

What about simply landcover=grass and foot=yes? Along with mapping out the pipeline separately? On 8 February 2017 at 11:29, Adam Horan wrote: > My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots of pipeline reserves.

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

On 08/02/17 11:17, Warin wrote: On 08-Feb-17 12:10 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote: On 08/02/17 11:00, Warin wrote: Some pipe lines cross farms, residential areas ... so ? I will ask on the tagging list as it is not Australian specific. I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume underground

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

On 08-Feb-17 12:10 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote: On 08/02/17 11:00, Warin wrote: Some pipe lines cross farms, residential areas ... so ? I will ask on the tagging list as it is not Australian specific. I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume underground and the location is not evident so

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

On 08/02/17 11:00, Warin wrote: Some pipe lines cross farms, residential areas ... so ? I will ask on the tagging list as it is not Australian specific. I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume underground and the location is not evident so you cannot map the pipe line itself. As

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

Yes, correct some pipelines cross private land and some across land with public access. In general near me the pipe is not visible, and it's not even always clear if it's gas, water or sewage etc. I'm most interested in showing public access of 'open' land in or near the residential areas. So yes

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

There's no real issue with heading out on your own with this type of tag. What you are doing is describing the type of park. So in this case the park is a pipeline reserve so therefore park=pipeline_reserve would be acceptable. People still regard it as a park which is the major tag. On

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

Some pipe lines cross farms, residential areas ... so ? I will ask on the tagging list as it is not Australian specific. I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume underground and the location is not evident so you cannot map the pipe line itself. As far as most people are concerned it

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

There's only a few hundred examples of park=* in taginfo, and none are for pipeline_reserve. I don't really want to head out on my own if there's already a convention. I'm not even sure if leisure=park is an accurate description :) On 8 February 2017 at 11:31, Ross Scanlon

Re: [talk-au] Harmonisation of the source tag for LPI Base Map

Absolutely, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct the plans must be first documented and discussed. Since this affects the local NSW community it should have been posted here on talk-au. The example you gave of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442899224/history

[talk-au] Tagging for Pipeline Reserves

My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots of pipeline reserves. I'm really not sure how to tag these. They appear to have public access for walking at least. (One local one has a sign disallowing golf...) Some others appear to be across private land, and i'm less interested in those, I'd

Re: [talk-au] Parks Vic data

I have often wondered where the existing National Park data comes from. In general it seems to exist in OSM in quite high fidelity however the boundaries are usually not evident on the ground or imagery. Yet whenever I've looked back through histories I can't find any reasonable source or

[talk-au] Harmonisation of the source tag for LPI Base Map

Hi, One mapper (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/LPISourceTagFix) has taken on themselves to 'harmonise' all the source tags that they consider should be 'NSW LPI Base Map'. No consultation - mass mechanical edit. I had some source tagged LPI Hydrology .. these too have been changed.

Re: [talk-au] Parks Vic data

On 8 February 2017 at 11:08, Ross Scanlon wrote: > capad The links for this are: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Collaborative_Australian_Protected_Areas_Database_(CAPAD) http://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad

Re: [talk-au] Parks Vic data

capad On 08/02/17 09:49, nwastra wrote: Hi I have found many problems with the Heathcote-Graytown National Park in Victoria. Is there a place from which I can download the boundary as we have done with the NSW LPI NPWSReserve - public/NSW_Administrative_Boundaries, so I sort out where the

[talk-au] Parks Vic data

Hi I have found many problems with the Heathcote-Graytown National Park in Victoria. Is there a place from which I can download the boundary as we have done with the NSW LPI NPWSReserve - public/NSW_Administrative_Boundaries, so I sort out where the gazetted boundary is and then fix the