On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 15:35, Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> Because of the simple way I split the files up, I've only got sporadic
> coverage - a few buildings per street from my 10% sample. I'm not sure if
> the original file is sorted by longitude/latitude in any way; or if the
> model simply
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:53, Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> There's a link on the github repo to download a GeoJSON file. They haven't
> made it available via rapid yet.
>
That would probably explain why I couldn't find it!
Looking at it via JOSM,
>
& seeing that I don't JOSM, I won't worry to
Where are you all finding this info?
I've had a look at RapiD & they either don't have much on the GC, or I'm
just doing something wrong (which is quite, quite possible! :-)), because I
can't see anything to check?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing
Looks like my other message didn't go through.
Agree re the slight rotational issues; and it being at about the level of a
new-intermediate contributor from the samples around Adelaide I managed to
look at.
I found sometimes, it would mistake bright concrete as part of a building
footprint.
Also buildings which are touching like a shop fronts are just one polygon,
but I don't think you'd ever be able to do this too reliably without a
survey anyway. Even if there is a small gap between buildings eg a garage
and residence sometimes it will join them into a single polygon.
What I feel
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 21:20, Simon Poole wrote:
> Just as a comment: there is nothing so time consuming as fixing badly
> mapped buildings (essentially drawing them from scratch is nearly always
> faster), I would only import building outlines that are at a quality level
> that you would not
Just as a comment: there is nothing so time consuming as fixing badly
mapped buildings (essentially drawing them from scratch is nearly always
faster), I would only import building outlines that are at a quality
level that you would not want to change them except if the building
itself has
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> and after a bit of digging came across this ODBL data:
> https://github.com/microsoft/AustraliaBuildingFootprints
>
> As fun as hand tracing data is; I'd be pretty keen to swap to small scale
> imports of this, suburb by suburb in my area.
>
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I was wondering how mapbox had coverage of areas that hadn't been traced
> into OSM; and after a bit of digging came across this ODBL data:
> https://github.com/microsoft/AustraliaBuildingFootprints
>
Not relevant to OSM here,
Hi folks,
I was wondering how mapbox had coverage of areas that hadn't been traced
into OSM; and after a bit of digging came across this ODBL data:
https://github.com/microsoft/AustraliaBuildingFootprints
As fun as hand tracing data is; I'd be pretty keen to swap to small scale
imports of this,
10 matches
Mail list logo
