On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 18:26, Ewen Hill wrote:
>
> Is there any State data we could use?
>
Mentioned earlier that I found https://www.data.qld.gov.au/dataset/rural-
fire-stations/resource/e09d0d06-b13e-4e52-b82d-1ce0cf05927c, but we'd
probably have to contact them for permission.
Thanks
Hi Bob,
There are many varied stations in Australia, from the William Creek
station being just a water tanker and attached pump sitting on the
forecourt without a shed, to multi-emergency sites like Pakenham in
Victoria. There are also local headquarters (LHQ's) and training grounds
that may or
Hi Y'all. (So lived in Texas in a past life..)
Possibly also worth noting
- Many a rural/remote site has an ill defined block boundary. Some are
tucked in corners of rec reserves and some are even on private land.
(which affects road access tags)
- Naming (on signs etc) may be problematic.
On 10/10/22 10:52, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 09:27, Mark Rattigan wrote:
There are also plenty of minor RFS brigades which operate out of
buildings that weren't originally built to be fire stations.
But how then do we tag all of those where the firies
Hi Folks,
Well I am not too sure that the correct tagging of buildings is applied at
all in Australia as I can only see about 200 uses of building:use=* in all
of Oz! Seems most folks use the building tag to denote current use rather
than initial construction intention. I am sure there are
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 09:27, Mark Rattigan wrote:
>
> There are also plenty of minor RFS brigades which operate out of buildings
> that weren't originally built to be fire stations.
>
But how then do we tag all of those where the firies operate out of a tin
shed?
Is it a
Hi Phil
I suspect that 'cleaning-up' these tags would require local knowledge for each
location, and is certainly not as clean-cut as making sure that either one or
the other is used.
There are cases when only the building tag should be used, and some when only
the amenity tag should be used.
7 matches
Mail list logo
