Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mapathon!

2014-12-08 Thread Jorieke Vyncke
Hallo allemaal! Nog eens een mailtje om jullie warm te maken... Volgende zaterdag is het van 14.30 - 20.00 uur Missing Maps Mapathon in Antwerpen! Je kan je nog steeds inschrijven via http://www.eventbrite.com/e/missing-maps-mapathon-tickets-14524165169 En wie nog meer informatie wil kan terecht

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Jachtpaden are not cycleway Highway (path along the rivers)

2014-12-08 Thread Jakka
Kurt Roeckx schreef op 8/12/2014 om 10:58: Every few months I find that someone changes is back to cycleway, but it's always someone else as far as I know. I've been fixing this for years. It's really annoying. I was looking for the write answers Missing of correct info and interpretati

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Jachtpaden are not cycleway Highway (path along the rivers)

2014-12-08 Thread Ben Laenen
On Monday 08 December 2014 10:58:58 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > access=private > foot=yes > bicycle=yes If we go this way, I'd prefer to stay closer to the signs and have it vehicle=private + bicycle=yes For the paved roads I guess it would then become highway=service, should we add a service=towpath

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Jachtpaden are not cycleway Highway (path along the rivers)

2014-12-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:08:20PM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: > > > @Ben : The legal definition (see website url) of 'Jaagpad' starts with: > > "Het jaagpad is een private dienstweg of exploitatieweg" . That means > > it's not a public highway.