+1 to Elliot Plack's proposal to use Simplify to remove the redundant
nodes from the poor quality imported buildings.
In fact, I did this myself for another massive import: User "jumbanho"
imported buildings for the large city of Raleigh, NC back in January
2010.
There were lots of degenerate
Stephan,
I can see you are correct that user "4719341" created thousands of
roads which are incorrectly tagged tertiary. Looking at the aerial,
almost all of them should be correctly tagged "unclassified" or
"track"; very few are actual tertiaries. They did this across almost
the entire Magway
+1 to what AlaskaDave said.
As far as I can tell in this case, the jaggies are a result of running
ScanAerial on imagery of a low resolution (i.e. zoomed out). At that
level (LandSat resolution), a smooth lake edge looks like a jagged set
of individual pixels, where each pixel is 28 meters
I've probably done the most NHD cleanup so far (at least some degree
of fixing on the entire state of NC, most of IL, northern MI, parts of
OK/TX/UT/CO, and a lot of CA), many hundreds of hours of manual work.
Just to chime in with agreement on what everyone has said, yes to:
1. NHD has lots of
If you look across a large area of the Maryland, for example around here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/39.11882/-76.62031
You may notice a few very odd things.
1. Back in 2015, user 'gdoyle' created a large number of buildings,
using small, incorrect geometry.
2. This week, user
Nominatim has been able to find waterway relations for at least a
couple years, now.
For example, if you search "Klamath River", Nominatim's top result is:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3624126
Which is great. But two days ago, I created another river:
Usually, using "overpass turbo" returns results which are very recent,
usually less than an hour.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Platform_Status gives an Overpass
status of "OK".
However, for the past 2 days, results seem to be very out of date.
As an example, this query:
As far as I can tell, the stats page
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html) which usually
updates every day, hasn't updated since November 4. Are people aware
of this and is there any ETA for a fix?
Thanks,
Ben
___
talk mailing list
There is a popular local restaurant which says on its website, "Many
ingredients and spices are brought directly from the town of Enssaro
in Ethiopia"
Curious, I looked for this town in OpenStreetMap. Nothing exists with
that spelling, but a similar spelling "Insarro" gives a single node
The tile renderer, "renderd", has been heavily overloaded for quite a
while, like 90% of the time it is dropping, and the dirty queue is
entirely ignored. However, in the past day, something has happened so
that it is even more overloaded, even the standard request queue is
not getting handled,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Richard wrote:
>> FWIW, I simply set the following key mapping in JOSM:
>>
>> Shift-D: add bridge=yes, layer=1
>> Shift-C: add tunnel=culvert, layer=-1
>
> nice.. but still need to select or add two nodes, split the
> ways, and select the
FWIW, I simply set the following key mapping in JOSM:
Shift-D: add bridge=yes, layer=1
Shift-C: add tunnel=culvert, layer=-1
Making bridges/culverts is then very quick and easy.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> 2016-05-31 15:03 GMT+02:00
; It appears from that list that the database servers are now a few
>> hundreds of miles from where the web servers are, causing the increase
>> in latency. I do not know if this is a permanent change, the thread on
>> osm-dev does seem to indicate that things are still in flux.
>
Several of us have noticed radically slowly upload speed for
changesets, roughly since the server move on May 9. Like, as
painfully slow as it used to be, it's now several times slower.
It's been discussed with @OSM_Tech on twitter, in this thread:
I thought it was odd that the survey listed two osm "gamifications" I'd
never heard of, and didn't mention a few I do know of, like the missingmaps
leaderboard ( http://www.missingmaps.org/leaderboards/#/missingmaps ), the
telenav challenges (2014-2015, with leaderboard and cash prizes) or
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Michael Reichert wrote:
>> I find this a really worthwhile conversation to have. IRC is still great for
>> some but it’s hardly inclusive.
>
> Is http://irc.openstreetmap.org/ no web interface?
I have tried (every year for the past ~20 years) to
I haven't been able to reach
http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html for the past 17
hours. Does the link work for others, or is there an ETA for it to come back?
Thanks,
Ben
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
FWIW, it's now 2:15 AM UTC (past the time it usually updates) and
there's still no status page at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html
Perhaps the bug is still there?
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote:
> On 08/12/15 17:45, Ben Discoe wrot
Just to chime in..
As someone who has worked on protected areas in OSM globally, it has
always been obvious that the landuse tags and the boundary tags
serve clear and different purposes.
US National Forests are boundaries around land which contain many
uses(*), and landuse=forest is only one of
19 matches
Mail list logo