On 2013-09-19 11:37, Marc Gemis wrote :
> Hallo Jean=Louis,
>
> access=no means that nobody has the right to go on the path, not that
> it is not possible.
> I vaguely remember seeing a similar discussion on the tagging mailing
> list a couple of months ago. Don't remember the outcome. can't find
ail.com]
> *Verzonden:* donderdag 19 september 2013 14:22
> *Aan:* talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> *Onderwerp:* [OSM-talk-be] [Sentier disparu par cause de vegetation]
>
> ** **
>
> Ik ga akkord met je glenn
>
> ** **
>
> dus ik gebruik dat:
>
&g
] [Sentier disparu par cause de vegetation]
On 2013-09-19 14:22, Jean-Louis Stanus wrote:
Ik ga akkord met je glenn
dus ik gebruik dat:
no highway key
maar alleen deze: designation=public_footpath
dank u alles
Bonjour Jean-Louis,
Je croix que sans 'highway key' c'
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
-- Message transféré --
From: Jean-Louis Stanus
To: talk-be@openstreetmap.org
Cc:
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:12:57 +0200
Subject: [OSM-talk-be] [Sentier dis
On 2013-09-19 14:22, Jean-Louis Stanus wrote:
Ik ga akkord met je glenn
dus ik gebruik dat:
no highway key
maar alleen deze: designation=public_footpath
dank u alles
Bonjour Jean-Louis,
Je croix que sans 'highway key' c'est une erreur, le plus correct est de
le garder et en plus, ajoute l
On Thursday 19 September 2013 14:22:01 Jean-Louis Stanus wrote:
> Ik ga akkord met je glenn
>
> dus ik gebruik dat:
>
> no highway key
>
> maar alleen deze: designation=public_footpath
designation=public_footpath doesn't mean anything on itself (that tag doesn't
have a definition in Belgium an
rbustes et ronces)? L'accès au chemin
> est devenu impraticable sans débrousailleuse.
> En ce moment, je cartographie ces sentiers comme ceci:
> highway=path
> access=no
> trail_visibility=no
>
> Qu'en pensez-vous?
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Jean-Louis Stanus
On 2013-09-19 13:05, Guy Vanvuchelen wrote:
Sommige paden zijn zo overwoekerd van gras en onkruid (zelfs struiken) dat
ze onbegaanbaar zijn. Zodra het maaien toegestaan is (juni?) worden ze
opgekuist maar enkele maanden later zijn ze weer onbegaanbaar. Het hangt er
dus echt vanaf wanneer je die
[mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be]
Verzonden: donderdag 19 september 2013 12:40
Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Sentier disparu par cause de vegetation]
On 2013-09-19 12:31, Glenn Plas wrote:
> On 2013-09-19 11:37, Marc Gemis wrote:
>> access=no means that nobody has
On 2013-09-19 12:31, Glenn Plas wrote:
On 2013-09-19 11:37, Marc Gemis wrote:
access=no means that nobody has the right to go on the path, not
that it is not possible.
Indeed, access=no is a different context.
You might also want to check out this tag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:
On 2013-09-19 11:37, Marc Gemis wrote:
Hallo Jean=Louis,
access=no means that nobody has the right to go on the path, not that
it is not possible.
Indeed, access=no is a different context.
You might also want to check out this tag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
Glenn
_
Hallo Jean=Louis,
access=no means that nobody has the right to go on the path, not that it
is not possible.
I vaguely remember seeing a similar discussion on the tagging mailing list
a couple of months ago. Don't remember the outcome. can't find it right now
found something on the help forum:
ht
[EN]
Hello everyone,
How to map paths that have disappeared during my last visit because of the
vegetation (shrubs and brambles)? Access to the path became impracticable
without mulcher.
At this point, I mapping the trails like this:
highway = path
access = no
trail_visibility = no
What do you th
13 matches
Mail list logo
