FWIW I had the same problem in Brussels when I tried to map regional
routes as RCN (like the Canal route or the Promenade verte), as
opposed to local/communal itineraries that exist too.
Someone downgraded them to LCN because RCN was used for node networks
around the region and they probably
Do you have a user id and/or nodes/ways ? We can check the history and
talk to this person, because in edit wars, it's usually the most
determined one that prevails, not always the correct one...
Glenn
On 04-02-16 11:29, Benoit Leseul wrote:
> FWIW I had the same problem in Brussels when I
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Glenn Plas wrote:
> So nothing really special besides description that this is a 'highway'
> and width. (and ... foot=no !).
Indeed, in Germany you are not allowed to walk on a cycleway (white
bicycle on blue background). Even when you get
I was reading this small arcticle,
http://www.citylab.com/commute/2016/01/germany-launches-its-national-bike-autobahn-cycle-network/422451/
So in Germany they just opened up a piece of a long bicycle highway, I
was intruiged, so I started looking for it in OSM. This is how germans
currently tag
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267939617
> So nothing really special besides description that this is a 'highway'
> and width. (and ... foot=no !).
I forgot to mention the important fact that there is a route relation
for that purpose.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5697663
Glenn
On Sunday 24 January 2016 22:38:06 Sander Deryckere wrote:
> I think we should get away from those rcn, lcn and ncn networks. And be
> freer in the allowed networks.
>
> Even now there are problems with rcn networks used for cycle nodes, as
> those are getting introduced in France and Germany,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Matthieu Gaillet wrote:
> This is however something that has to be discussed on a higher level than
> Belgium. Where is this place ?
As Glenn wrote, here is a good place to discuss first. When no
solution is found, or when you want to hear
Hi, thanks all for your answers.
I agree with Jo and Sander : there is something missing in the current way of
describing those bicycle highways which are indeed very specific in their
realisation (exactly like a car highway) and their use (connecting cities).
I don’t agree with Sander when
> However, before talking about relation, I think a specific value should
> be introduced for the _highway key_ : “cyclehighway" for instance. This
> would help the renderer to show those infrastructures differently than
> the usual “cycleway” (the infamous "piste cyclable” that usually sounds
>
Hi,
Below you will find some information about the developing bicycle highways (or
fast cycling routes) a bit everywhere in the world.
I was wondering if anything was foreseen to tag such highways ? If not, what's
the best place to discuss this, since I guess this should be uniform at world
Nothing really special about them, highway=cycleway should be appropriate.
Glenn
On 24-01-16 13:12, Matthieu Gaillet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below you will find some information about the developing bicycle
> highways (or fast cycling routes) a bit everywhere in the world.
>
> I was wondering if
Bicycle highways are more like bicycle routes than different highway types.
They are a route specifically made for commuting, connecting residential
area with some work center in a rather straight line.
As such, I think those could get tagged as a cycle route with some specific
sub tags (like a
Between Leuven and Brussels they are marked in a way that is verifiable on
the ground.
We need a separate 'network' tag for them though, and it would be nice to
see they get rendered on the specialised bicycle maps.
Jo
2016-01-24 15:31 GMT+01:00 Sander Deryckere :
>
The Fiets-o-Strade between Antwerpen en Mechelen is a relation [1]. I
don't know who created it.
As far as I remember there are "maps" along the route. I think the
blue sign [2] is indicating it.
For the rest you will only see destination signs for cyclist [3]
[1]
There is a problem with the 'network' tag for those Fietsostrades.
The change of the network tag of the HST-Route Leuven-Brussel by the
creator 3 years ago from 'network=rcn' to 'network=lcn' is justified "to
solve a color conflict with the cycle node network". This looks like
tagging for the
I think we should get away from those rcn, lcn and ncn networks. And be
freer in the allowed networks.
Even now there are problems with rcn networks used for cycle nodes, as
those are getting introduced in France and Germany, while those countries
already use those networks for other route types.
16 matches
Mail list logo