How did the mapper get this info? What licence is it under? FoI for example is
copyright and so still needs to be released under a suitable licence. AFAIK
local authorities are responsible for naming roads not the DfT.
Cheers Chris
John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:
I had a response.
An internet search for Foston Hatton Hilton Bypass gives a good
number of results from official sources, including parliament and
highways.gov.uk
The A650 Bingley Bypass/throughpass near me was recently given a name
Sir Fred Hoyle Way and name signs at all the slip roads, so I added
this to
There are no such signs on the road, it is just the A50. I travel along it
every fortnight.
I would agree that we change the tags to something else, such as official_name
or similar. I am happy to volunteer.
In the satnav senario long names such as this just confuse when the user does
not see
Chris Hill wrote:
How did the mapper get this info? What licence is it under? FoI for
example is copyright and so still needs to be released under a
suitable licence. AFAIK local authorities are responsible for naming
roads not the DfT.
(from OSM messages from the original mapper following
Hi all,
Thanks for all your help with this. Thought I should update.
After getting confirmation of the validity of using the data, my friend and
his colleagues successfully merged their postcode list with the CodePoint
Open dataset and sent me the results. I then converted the
Philip Barnes wrote:
I did briefly discuss this with Andy on IRC and the other issue is
the insertion of soft-hyphens into the names so Hatton becomes
Hat-ton. Not sure why, is he trying to make a satnav pronounce
each syllable?
Or copied and pasted from a document?
cheers
Richard
--
I have had more correspondence from Mauls.
He is adamant that he is correct and that I don't know what I am doing (mainly
because he has contributed way more than me and doing it a lot longer. 104k
nodes me vs 140k node Maulsyeah way more and I started with this (did some
minor stuff
Aha, it's Mauls is it... He is indeed very prolific, and adds a lot
of missing details across the whole planet. However he never seems to
disclose his sources, either in the source tag or in changeset comments.
Colin
On 2013-02-20 14:18, John Baker wrote:
I have had more
correspondence
I am a novice when it comes to road names. I've probably only done a
couple, if that, so apologies if I'm stating anything that is already
well known.
A friend was involved in the construction of these
bypasses. I understand that the body for this was the Highways Agency
and through their
On 20 Feb 2013 19:38, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
...I certainly wouldn't defend his attitude...
I don't know Mauls from Adam but how would you feel if you had been
contributing to the project for five years and someone you'd never heard of
sent you an unfriendly message
On 20/02/13 20:15, Kevin Peat wrote:
On 20 Feb 2013 19:38, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com
mailto:dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
...I certainly wouldn't defend his attitude...
I don't know Mauls from Adam but how would you feel if you had been
contributing to the project for
On 20 Feb 2013 21:14, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
...He copied data from a local newspaper article to name a road
wrongly...
Mauls might be wrong in this case but the name of a road in the local paper
isn't copyrighted. It's a basic fact, the newspaper didn't create it and
they
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 15:01 +0100, Colin Smale wrote:
Aha, it's Mauls is it... He is indeed very prolific, and adds a lot of
missing details across the whole planet. However he never seems to
disclose his sources, either in the source tag or in changeset
comments.
I have spotted that Mauls
Richard Fairhurst richard@...
writes:
Philip Barnes wrote:
I did briefly discuss this with
Andy on IRC and the other issue is
the insertion of soft-hyphens
into the names so Hatton
becomes
Hat-ton. Not sure why, is he
trying to make a satnav pronounce
each syllable?
Or
Hi imports,
Earlier last year I downloaded the Chicago building footprints shapefile
[0] from the Chicago data portal, chopped it into manageable bits and
started importing it into OSM. Halfway through the process of merging and
uploading this data I read the data portal's license [1] closer,
I just happened to spot a place where there is a possible coping from Google
Maps.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/?mt0=mapnikmt1=googlemapmakerlon=-75.5301lat=40.07484zoom=16
While it doesn't look exact on the curves, the places where the ramps
start/end/merge seems to be an exact match to
If I weren't confined to my phone right now, I'd check it myself, but are
there any GPS tracks along the new interchange?
On Feb 20, 2013 9:58 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I just happened to spot a place where there is a possible coping from
Google Maps.
I see it shows up on google mapmaker, but not google maps except at high
zoom as under construction. Is this possibly entered both places by the
same person?
Regardless it should still be looked into.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.comwrote:
If I weren't
Ahh nevermind, I just logged into mapmaker and the only user edits there
were POI's
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I see it shows up on google mapmaker, but not google maps except at high
zoom as under construction. Is this possibly entered both places
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:37:00 -0500
From: dale.p...@gmail.com
To: claysmal...@gmail.com
CC: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Possible coping from Google Maps
I see it shows up on google mapmaker, but not google maps except at high zoom
as
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
