Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

2013-05-29 Thread eMerzh
the checkbox with addresses is
here :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=15lat=50.94194lon=3.06984layers=BFFTitem=2060level=1,2

if the link isn't ok, you have to set level 1 and 2 then the item in fr is
numéros de rue

you might find some helps about the errors here :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmose/erreurs

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=2060


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why do they complain about

 access = no @ (weight  3.5)

 ?

 I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional restrictions. Is
 there another way ?


 m


 On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't see which checkbox corresponds to the addresses. Hopefully they
 are smart enough to look at the associated street relation as well (unlike
 another quality control tool).

 Too bad they do not understand that for walking networks you can have a
 relation with 1 member. Now I have to click away all those false positives
 I've introduced.

 m.


 On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:50 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 i don't know if everybody knows osmose ( osmose.openstreetmap.fr ) :  a
 OSM QA tool.

  While i was talking about the integration of urbis with the osmose
 devs,
 they told me that nearly half (ok might less than that) of the DB of
 errors are in fact
 Addresses errors in Belgium .
 Like here :

 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=13lat=50.83942lon=3.69074layers=BFFT

 I was baffled so if you're bored, :) let's fix this :)


 Regards,

 eMerzh

 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be




 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

2013-05-29 Thread Marc Gemis
thanks !


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:33 AM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote:

 the checkbox with addresses is
 here :
 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=15lat=50.94194lon=3.06984layers=BFFTitem=2060level=1,2

 if the link isn't ok, you have to set level 1 and 2 then the item in fr is
 numéros de rue

 you might find some helps about the errors here :
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmose/erreurs

 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=2060


 On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why do they complain about

 access = no @ (weight  3.5)

 ?

 I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional restrictions.
 Is there another way ?


 m


 On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't see which checkbox corresponds to the addresses. Hopefully they
 are smart enough to look at the associated street relation as well (unlike
 another quality control tool).

 Too bad they do not understand that for walking networks you can have a
 relation with 1 member. Now I have to click away all those false positives
 I've introduced.

 m.


 On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:50 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 i don't know if everybody knows osmose ( osmose.openstreetmap.fr ) :
 a OSM QA tool.

  While i was talking about the integration of urbis with the osmose
 devs,
 they told me that nearly half (ok might less than that) of the DB of
 errors are in fact
 Addresses errors in Belgium .
 Like here :

 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=13lat=50.83942lon=3.69074layers=BFFT

 I was baffled so if you're bored, :) let's fix this :)


 Regards,

 eMerzh

 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be




 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be



 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

2013-05-29 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
On 2013-05-29 07:39, Marc Gemis wrote :
 Why do they complain about

 access = no @ (weight  3.5) 

 ?

 I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional
 restrictions. Is there another way ?

Remember that, instead of coding all the rules that are in the Wiki,
they prefer to automatically deduce some rules from what the majority of
mappers do.  I wonder if they analyze false positive that way too.
They welcome the remarks very much.
For example, there was a rule (of theirs) saying that the character code
for the keys is, otherwise said, ASCII, which is indeed what the
majority of keys is using.  I pointed out that not only the rule is
UTF-8 but that discussions insist on UTF-8.

Cheers,

André.


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

2013-05-29 Thread Gilbert Hersschens
It's complaining that neutron pipe is incorrect. Of course it is a
non-existing tag! How many neutron pipes exist on the entire OSM map? This
is the largest linear accelerator in Europe (just across my home). How can
we teach osmose to accept new tags? Just mark it as false positive ?

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=18lat=51.1972982lon=5.0442162layers=BFFT


Gilbert


On 28 May 2013 22:50, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 i don't know if everybody knows osmose ( osmose.openstreetmap.fr ) :  a
 OSM QA tool.

 While i was talking about the integration of urbis with the osmose devs,
 they told me that nearly half (ok might less than that) of the DB of
 errors are in fact
 Addresses errors in Belgium .
 Like here :

 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=13lat=50.83942lon=3.69074layers=BFFT

 I was baffled so if you're bored, :) let's fix this :)


 Regards,

 eMerzh

 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

2013-05-29 Thread eMerzh
We can teach osmose by saying it's a false positive...

a dev will propably look at  all the false positives and decide what to do
with it 
So wa can probably say : Teach osmoses devs :p


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Gilbert Hersschens
gherssch...@gmail.comwrote:

 It's complaining that neutron pipe is incorrect. Of course it is a
 non-existing tag! How many neutron pipes exist on the entire OSM map? This
 is the largest linear accelerator in Europe (just across my home). How can
 we teach osmose to accept new tags? Just mark it as false positive ?


 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=18lat=51.1972982lon=5.0442162layers=BFFT


 Gilbert


 On 28 May 2013 22:50, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 i don't know if everybody knows osmose ( osmose.openstreetmap.fr ) :  a
 OSM QA tool.

 While i was talking about the integration of urbis with the osmose devs,
 they told me that nearly half (ok might less than that) of the DB of
 errors are in fact
 Addresses errors in Belgium .
 Like here :

 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=13lat=50.83942lon=3.69074layers=BFFT

 I was baffled so if you're bored, :) let's fix this :)


 Regards,

 eMerzh

 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be



 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


[OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

2013-05-28 Thread eMerzh
Hi,
i don't know if everybody knows osmose ( osmose.openstreetmap.fr ) :  a OSM
QA tool.

While i was talking about the integration of urbis with the osmose devs,
they told me that nearly half (ok might less than that) of the DB of errors
are in fact
Addresses errors in Belgium .
Like here :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=13lat=50.83942lon=3.69074layers=BFFT

I was baffled so if you're bored, :) let's fix this :)


Regards,

eMerzh
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

2013-05-28 Thread Marc Gemis
I don't see which checkbox corresponds to the addresses. Hopefully they are
smart enough to look at the associated street relation as well (unlike
another quality control tool).

Too bad they do not understand that for walking networks you can have a
relation with 1 member. Now I have to click away all those false positives
I've introduced.

m.


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:50 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 i don't know if everybody knows osmose ( osmose.openstreetmap.fr ) :  a
 OSM QA tool.

 While i was talking about the integration of urbis with the osmose devs,
 they told me that nearly half (ok might less than that) of the DB of
 errors are in fact
 Addresses errors in Belgium .
 Like here :

 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=13lat=50.83942lon=3.69074layers=BFFT

 I was baffled so if you're bored, :) let's fix this :)


 Regards,

 eMerzh

 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address Problems and Osmose...

2013-05-28 Thread Marc Gemis
Why do they complain about

access = no @ (weight  3.5)

?

I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional restrictions. Is
there another way ?


m


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:

 I don't see which checkbox corresponds to the addresses. Hopefully they
 are smart enough to look at the associated street relation as well (unlike
 another quality control tool).

 Too bad they do not understand that for walking networks you can have a
 relation with 1 member. Now I have to click away all those false positives
 I've introduced.

 m.


 On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:50 PM, eMerzh merz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 i don't know if everybody knows osmose ( osmose.openstreetmap.fr ) :  a
 OSM QA tool.

  While i was talking about the integration of urbis with the osmose devs,
 they told me that nearly half (ok might less than that) of the DB of
 errors are in fact
 Addresses errors in Belgium .
 Like here :

 http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/?zoom=13lat=50.83942lon=3.69074layers=BFFT

 I was baffled so if you're bored, :) let's fix this :)


 Regards,

 eMerzh

 ___
 Talk-be mailing list
 Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be



___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be