Hi, I can help with that.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:48 PM, G. Michael Carter wrote:
> Hey I can see my house in there! Amazing job!!
>
> Looks great. Few things I found so far.
>
> Data is out of date in many areas.
>
>1. Lakes no longer there. (drained a few years ago and
>re-lands
You may wish to download JOSM and do a few corrections.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Josm
Thanks John
On 2 June 2010 16:48, G. Michael Carter wrote:
> Hey I can see my house in there! Amazing job!!
>
> Looks great. Few things I found so far.
>
> Data is out of date in many areas.
>
Hey I can see my house in there! Amazing job!!
Looks great. Few things I found so far.
Data is out of date in many areas.
Lakes no longer there. (drained a few years ago and
re-landscaped).
Also the residential area stops in the north-west end, et all the
roads
for the residentia
Hi,
I have added the comment over on the talk page of this feature
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:CanVec:_Buildings_and_structures_(BS)
formerly listed as man_made=storage; building=liquid_storage_tank,
CanVec has it listed as man_made=storage_tank; content=water, perhaps
it should be ju
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Bégin, Daniel
wrote:
> Bonjour Richard - et les autres cartographes d'Openstreetmap
>
> First, sample files have been modified ...
> - Peterborough-that-looked-like-Halifax has been replaced !-)
> - addr:interpolation tag value=yes is replaced by odd or even
>
Bonjour Richard - et les autres cartographes d'Openstreetmap
First, sample files have been modified ...
- Peterborough-that-looked-like-Halifax has been replaced !-)
- addr:interpolation tag value=yes is replaced by odd or even
- Missing names on some dual carriageways have been corrected
- 040P16
Yup, but i'm sure maybe Daniel can explain it.
This time, i'll post it to the wiki :-)
On 6/2/10, G. Michael Carter wrote:
> I know I'm jumping way way ahead... but once we get all the CanVec.osm
> files imported for all of Canada... what happens with the next version
> of CanVec data?
>
> Are t
I know I'm jumping way way ahead... but once we get all the CanVec.osm
files imported for all of Canada... what happens with the next version
of CanVec data?
Are there going to be diff files or is there a program out there to
compare the difference of current OSM data to a new file?
> The addr: stuff I saw in Peterborough-that-looked-like-Halifax, had
> proper addr:housenumber on the end nodes. Very nice.
I noticed that too. My second comment about the addr:interpolation
even/odd thing still applies though.
I agree, those interpolation ways look great! So much better th
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> First of all, WOW, great job. I could never get my address interpolation
> ways to look that nice doing them manually!!
>
> I have a few questions about the Address Interpolation ways in the Halifax
> sample:
> 1. I didn't notic
Hi Daniel,
First of all, WOW, great job. I could never get my address interpolation
ways to look that nice doing them manually!!
I have a few questions about the Address Interpolation ways in the Halifax
sample:
1. I didn't notice any addr:housenumber tags on the start or end nodes of
any of th
Hi Mikey,
Orangeville city area (040P16) will be include in samples later today :-)
For others, I propose you look at existing sample. There is now enough sample
to have an idea at the product definition.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:tal
Any possibility of getting 041P16 (Orangeville) area as a sample. It's
where I live. Figure local knowledge would be a good way to verify the
area too ;-)
Mikey
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/list
Hi,
I don't like to nit-pick, but i will anyway :-)
amenity=place_of_worship is listed with including the 'building=yes' tag.
Heres why, if it was a 'grave_yard' the as it is a given that it is
not a building.
So i think its redundent to have for a node.
Once the building are is known then it cou
14 matches
Mail list logo
