And it is done.
I have reverted all his changesets from June 5th and 6th, so the great
swaths of Ottawa that were removed should be back. The revert changesets
clearly indicate the changeset being reverted and the reason for the
reversion. (You can find the list on my edits page at
http://www.open
> From: James A. Treacy [mailto:tre...@debian.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 1:06 PM
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Talk-ca] NTS tile 040P
>
> Hello,
> I believe I am looking for a subtile of 040P but the directory
> ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/osm/pub/040/P/ is empty.
>
> This
A bug in JOSM? It's a fair chunk of code that has been added to over the
years so practically no one person really fully understands the code any
more. Bit like the old IBM operating systems on average they used to add a
bug practically every time they updated to take a bug out.
The selection us
I am surprised that you removed a feature that was 100% not connected with you
in any way.
-Original Message-
From: john whelan
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:32:11
To:
Cc: Samuel Longiaru;
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?
> some of them only list him in the history when he deleted
> some of them only list him in the history when he deleted them.
But why would that surprise you? The objective was to remove dubious data
from the database not to delete anything else.
Cheerio John
On 7 June 2011 17:37, Gordon Dewis wrote:
> The reverting has already begun. I have looked a
I think I'm reasonably happy at the moment. I have indicated I have some
concerns about some of my sources meeting the ODBL license requirements and
I have some concerns about importing data under the new CT. I have taken
reasonable steps to protect the integrity of the OSM database.
It sounds a
The reverting has already begun. I have looked at some of the features deleted
and some of them only list him in the history when he deleted them.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Longiaru
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:34:44
To:
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?
_
Hate to jump in where it's not wanted but...
Just wondering if there is some kind of middle ground solution here.
John clearly does not feel comfortable with having his imports in the
database and so has removed them. Not something we would like to see
happen too often, but it has happened.
Is
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 04:25:09PM -0400, Nakor Osm wrote:
> I personally use
> http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/browse.do?produit=cded&decoupage=50k&map=canada
>
> Also ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/osm/pub/040/P/ is populated fine for me.
Wow. It hasn't worked for a week for me and it just worked
Bonjour James,
When I clik on the link you provide I can see all expected 040PXX files (the
directory is not empty).
May be you are trying to access them through http? Have a look at
http://geogratis.gc.ca/geogratis/en/faq.html#q4
We don't have the ressources to provide the community with som
I personally use
http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/browse.do?produit=cded&decoupage=50k&map=canada
Also ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/osm/pub/040/P/ is populated fine for me.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/
Hello,
I believe I am looking for a subtile of 040P but the directory
ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/osm/pub/040/P/ is empty.
This brings up a related point:
Is there a web page that makes it easy to find the tile you want?
A mashup would be ideal.
I took a quick look at the openstreetmap OpenLayers
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:29:43PM -0400, Bégin, Daniel wrote:
> Bonjour James,
>
> A wetland outside of land is allowed in Canvec and in Osm...
>
> See http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.63532&lon=-73.4594&zoom=15&layers=M
>
> The wetland spreads each side of the coastline feature
Thanks. Th
Bonjour James,
A wetland outside of land is allowed in Canvec and in Osm...
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.63532&lon=-73.4594&zoom=15&layers=M
The wetland spreads each side of the coastline feature
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: James A. Treacy [mailto:tre...@debian.org]
Se
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:48 PM, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Hello,
> Is it allowed to have wetland outside of land?
I don't know.
I think it depends on how your definitions match for the extent of the
wetland vs. the extent of the other water body. Certainly tidal water
can be represented differen
Hello,
Is it allowed to have wetland outside of land?
A good example, is in tile 040J03.3 where there is an island called
Bois Blanc Island in canvec (I've also seen it referred to as Boblo
Island). Most of the island is a single inner way but there is wetland
connected to the island outside of th
> In my edits I have included at least one bus stop from GTFS data, I
> don't have the rights to license it under CC-by-ODBL. At the time it
> was done my expectation was that this information would become
> available under CC-by-SA in the short term this has not happened.
>
> I have included info
To recap:
The objective of moving to ODBL is to give a stronger legal position for the
database. This position can be undermined if any included data has not been
directly created by a mapper in the field.
In my edits I have included at least one bus stop from GTFS data, I don't
have the rights
OK curiosity is getting the better of me. What's the issue? Why the
sudden panic attack to remove data? (I must probably missed that part :)
What's wrong with CT/ODbL?
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, john whelan
> wrote:
> > I would b
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, john whelan wrote:
> I would be extremely happy to see all my edits removed.
Earlier you said that you were happy to have your surveyed data
included in OSM under CT/ODbL, but you wanted Canvec data you uploaded
removed.
Now you say, "I would be extremely happy t
On 11-06-07 06:31 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, john whelan wrote:
I would be extremely happy to see all my edits removed.
So you are happy to be known as a vandal, in order to ... Why? That seems odd.
He wants his data removed, and he doesn't care how. It's clear
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, john whelan wrote:
> Earlier, Jonathan Crowe said, but JW messed up the attribution:
> > Treat his edits as vandalism and proceed accordingly.
> I would be extremely happy to see all my edits removed.
So you are happy to be known as a vandal, in order to ... Why
Treat his edits as vandalism and proceed accordingly.
"Virtual ban
When a contributor is subject to a 'virtual ban' (see notes above) then all
their past work may be removed and all new work will be reverted without
review until they possibly contact the Data Working Group and request a
review of
I will do that this evening.
--G
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Crowe
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:03:41
To:
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?
John is missing the point, perhaps deliberately. He hasn't listened to
a thing we've said. He's just justifying and rationalizing his
o
John is missing the point, perhaps deliberately. He hasn't listened to
a thing we've said. He's just justifying and rationalizing his
original decision.
There's no point in discussing this any further. He doesn't get it and
he never will. We're wasting time here. Treat his edits as vandalism
and p
If the data had been left tagged as not CT then OSM would have deleted it in
2012. The only difference would be that any edits you made from now to then
would also be deleted. Your concerns should be brought to OSM's attention.
If they have a way of deleting my edits that doesn't impact your work
26 matches
Mail list logo