Re: [Talk-ca] Re : Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread Daniel Begin
Interesting, I guess I'll keep the access=no tag until it is confirmed that the road is definitely closed. Then, I'll probably tag it as abandoned=yes (instead of disused) as I suspect it won't be maintained as it is considered dangerous. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned Someone

Re: [Talk-ca] Re : Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread Harald Kliems
Hi Daniel, 2012/2/25 Daniel Begin : > Le problème est qu'il n'y a pas de construction sur la route. J'utilise ce > tag seulement lorsqu'il s'agit d'un vrai chantier... For this reason, I still think that access=no is the cleanest solution, no matter what mapnik renders. The only alternative I ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Re : Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread Daniel Begin
Bonjour Pierre, Le problème est qu'il n'y a pas de construction sur la route. J'utilise ce tag seulement lorsqu'il s'agit d'un vrai chantier... The problem I see is that that there is no construction on the road. I use it only on real construction site... http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat

[Talk-ca] Re : Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr
Daniel Regardes la route 35 en construction présentement. voir http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/86575482/ Le rendu me semble clair relativement à l'état de la route. Je te suggère donc de mettre une note indiquant la situation et d'utiliser les balises suivantes : * construction

Re: [Talk-ca] Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread Harald Kliems
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Begin wrote: > Access=no is rendered at lower zooms but when you look at the map for a trip > planning, you don't zoom that much! I don't think that's an argument against tagging it with only access=no. I do agree, however, that highways tagged with access=

Re: [Talk-ca] Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread James Ewen
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > but is > it really a primary if it’s closed until further notice? This a kind of strange comment... why would the classification of a road change due to whether it is open or closed? The Trans-Canada highway washed out last spring during hea

Re: [Talk-ca] Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread Daniel Begin
Bonjour Paul No construction activities. Actually, they are planning to move the road somewhere else since it's the 2nd or the 3rd time they have to close it! However no official proposition yet. Access=no is rendered at lower zooms but when you look at the map for a trip planning, you don

Re: [Talk-ca] Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread Paul Norman
If they were doing work on it I’d suggest highway=construction. If they’ve just closed it indefinitely then I’d say access=no is the best way, but is it really a primary if it’s closed until further notice? Access=no should likely be rendered at lower zooms when on major road types From: Da

[Talk-ca] Closed Road Tagging

2012-02-25 Thread Daniel Begin
Bonjour, There is an primary road (ref=112) around here that have been closed for two year - authorities detected cracks in the pavement that was suggesting that the road was sliding toward a large mining pit. All traffic is divert toward Vimy Ridge since then. http://www.openstreetmap.org/