Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Thread Joshua Kenney
If StatsCan is going to gather more than the just building data under the same licence, that would be sweet! The other data sets from Airdrie it would be nice to import, eventually, are address points, neighbourhood and quadrant boundaries, park benches and picnic tables, and city maintained

Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Thread Joshua Kenney
Thanks for that update on the current status of the building import! I've checked the Stats Canada site, and they do indeed have the up-to-date building data from Airdrie (although stripped of the height and elevation tags). I seem to be the only active mapper in Airdrie, is it possible for

Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Thread john whelan
I'd check to see if it is included in the Stats Canada data first. If not then the buildings will be available in the Microsoft data which is correctly licensed. The open data licenses are a mine field. Stats is looking a releasing more municipal Open Data under the Federal Government license.

Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Thread James
ODBL also has the annoying part where the data has to be fully licensed by the data provider: if city buys data from 3rd party and they still retain rights on it, then it becomes a problem On Tue., Apr. 23, 2019, 12:09 p.m. Jarek Piórkowski, wrote: > IANAL but as I understand it, you would have

Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
IANAL but as I understand it, you would have to have them release the data as public domain, under CC0, or under Open Database License (the latter is the OSM license). I don't think something like "permission for use in OpenStreetMap" would be sufficient, as the OSM licensing is intended to also

Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Thread Joshua Kenney
If I can obtain explicit permission from the city, would I still need to wait for the LWG approval? --Joshua On 2019-04-22 16:03, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions! > > To answer your first question: the non-building data sets (parks,