If I can obtain explicit permission from the city, would I still need to wait for the LWG approval?
--Joshua On 2019-04-22 16:03, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions! > > To answer your first question: the non-building data sets (parks, > address points, bus stops, etc) are not currently importable without > further effort: we would have to get that exact licence (with text > including "City of Airdrie") approved by the OSM Licensing Working > Group. I don't know if the LWG would object to the attribution > requirements, possibly not, but the approval itself might take quite a > while anyway, as lawyer things don't move fast. > > --Jarek > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 15:42, Joshua Kenney <kenney...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Hello everybody! >> Relatively new mapper here. I've been working on mapping my home town, and >> a couple of other places I've been, for the past 3 or 4 months. >> >> I have found that my city of Airdrie, AB has a number of datasets available >> under an Open Data Licence: >> >> http://data-airdrie.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/our-open-licence >> The licence terms look straight forward enough, are there any additional >> steps I need to take to confirm compatibility with OSM? >> >> One of the datasets includes building footprints. Would importing that get >> in the way of the import of the national data? Where can I access the >> national data to compare the quality? >> >> --Joshua >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
