Hello:
Does anybody see any more problem areas?
Pretty much no more polygon problems I think. Or maybe I hope
Andrew / CancevImports
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 08:05 -0400, Andrew wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:27 -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> >
> > On 2017-07-17 10
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:27 -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> On 2017-07-17 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
> >
> >
> > There is a new layer with this data now in the OSMI:
> > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.28033&lat=53.722
> > 07&zoom=8&overlays=same_tags_on_outer_ring
>
> Th
That is helpful!
Thank Jochen
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, 17 July, 2017 10:27
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> &g
On 2017-07-17 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> There is a new layer with this data now in the OSMI:
> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.28033&lat=53.72207&zoom=8&overlays=same_tags_on_outer_ring
Thanks, Jochen! That's very helpful.
Looks like CanvecImports cleaned up many of the
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > How difficult would it be to add this to OSM inspector? Not everybody has
> > Postgres running, and is able to use osm2pgsql. Yes, there is documentation,
> > but it requires some technical skills. Also, it would be very convenient to
data on this list.
Cheers,
Daniel
From: Begin Daniel [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 16:00
To: Alan Richards; Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Thanks everyone,
Stewart sent me an example I can use ☺
Daniel
From
Thanks everyone,
Stewart sent me an example I can use ☺
Daniel
From: Begin Daniel [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 09:53
To: Alan Richards; Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
If someone could provide me with an
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 00:51
To: Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Thanks for a good workflow - I cleared up 8 so far pretty quickly around Hope,
BC. There's a bunch in a cluster around Merritt too. I'm gue
Thanks for a good workflow - I cleared up 8 so far pretty quickly around
Hope, BC. There's a bunch in a cluster around Merritt too. I'm guessing
it's certain imports or import authors vs others that makes the difference.
alarobric
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> On 2
On 2017-07-02 04:41 PM, Begin Daniel wrote:
>
> However, since the same translator was used for all the polygons, the
> problem should also appear on water bodies, etc. The problem may have
> been related to the complexity of the polygons to convert.
Hi Daniel - yes, I'm seeing a bunch of water r
://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9832.
-Original Message-
From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 1 July, 2017 17:43
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Hi James,
> Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, j
On 2017-07-01 05:22 PM, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> There is nothing specific about woods here.
It seems, though, that the root problem in Canada is *mostly* related to
woods imported from Canvec. And we have some very large forestry
relations indeed. I was finding that the JOSM process was using 13 G
Depends where you get the data I think, canvec from ftp is different from
canvec from toporama/atlas
On Jul 1, 2017 5:44 PM, "Stewart C. Russell" wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> > Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
>
> I've found a whole bunch of Canvec 10 data with th
Hi James,
> Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
I've found a whole bunch of Canvec 10 data with this problem west of
Sudbury. I think it may still be an issue with later versions.
Stewart
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Ta
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 04:04:25PM -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> On 2017-07-01 04:30 AM, Frank Steggink wrote:
> >
> > To all, this is the procedure I used yesterday, and probably something
> > similar also by Pierre.
> > * Not sure if it is a requirement, but it's better to use 64 bit Java.
On 2017-07-01 04:30 AM, Frank Steggink wrote:
>
> To all, this is the procedure I used yesterday, and probably something
> similar also by Pierre.
> * Not sure if it is a requirement, but it's better to use 64 bit Java.
> …
Thanks for this, Frank. I think I've found a way to make this a bit
quick
s
À : Frank Steggink
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Envoyé le : samedi 1 juillet 2017 8h25
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Error free Québec, just in time for Canada day! Good job Pierre :-)
On Jul 1, 2017 4:34 AM, "Frank Steggink" wrote:
Hi Jochen,
Maybe a MapRoulette
Error free Québec, just in time for Canada day! Good job Pierre :-)
On Jul 1, 2017 4:34 AM, "Frank Steggink" wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> Maybe a MapRoulette challenge might even not be necessary. Yesterday I
> started to clean up a bit in Québec, but since it was already past midnight
> for me, I wa
Hi Jochen,
Maybe a MapRoulette challenge might even not be necessary. Yesterday I
started to clean up a bit in Québec, but since it was already past
midnight for me, I wanted to continue this morning. To my surprise
Pierre has done a lot of work and now the entire province of Québec
looks to
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:47:36PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> On 30-06-2017 21:21, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> > > Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see
> > > one
> > > case of old style multipolygon
ss facilities, commerce, fast foods :) Some nordic
villages are hundred of km apart. Should we ignore them?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=5/56.969/-83.979
regard
Pierre
*De :* James
*À :* Jochen Topf
*Cc :* Tal
If we have a overpass query that Pierre provided, we can create a
maproulette task...then everyone can contribute! I can read up on how to
create a task or ask Martjin
---
Si nous avons un query overpass que Pierre nous ont fournit, on pourrais
créer une tache maproulette...pour que tout le monde
On 30-06-2017 21:21, Jochen Topf wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see one
case of old style multipolygon, in Manitoba. Last week, when you posted your
original message, I just saw one case i
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Envoyé le : vendredi 30 juin 2017 16h04
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
If it's just removing tags, on inner polygons of a multipolygon, that should be
manageable in itself... is there a way you are querying for said items without
setting up
If it's just removing tags, on inner polygons of a multipolygon, that
should be manageable in itself... is there a way you are querying for said
items without setting up a postgresql database?
On Jun 30, 2017 3:57 PM, "James" wrote:
> To be fairyour example is from Canvec 4.0.that's reaa
To be fairyour example is from Canvec 4.0.that's reaaallly
oldwas it possible that was a way of tagging back in the days? Or was
it created initially as a polygon and was later converted to a relation?
Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
On J
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see one
> case of old style multipolygon, in Manitoba. Last week, when you posted your
> original message, I just saw one case in New Brunswick. IIRC, it was a park,
has to work around this or handle the
>>>complaints.
>>> * The Canadian community steps up and fixes the data, automatically or
>>>manually.
>>> * We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import.
>>>
>>> Jochen
>>>
>>>
data stays in OSM. Not a good solution,
>>because every user of the data has to work around this or handle the
>>complaints.
>> * The Canadian community steps up and fixes the data, automatically or
>>manually.
>> * We ask the Data Working Group to remove the
:
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
From: Jochen Topf
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Hi!
In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn't take
old-style multipolyg
unity steps up and fixes the data, automatically
or
>
> manually.
>
> * We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import.
>
>
>
> Jochen
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 1
s the data, automatically or
> manually.
> * We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import.
>
> Jochen
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> > From: Jochen Topf
> > To: talk-ca@openstre
From: Jochen Topf
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
>
> Hi!
>
> In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
> the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn't take
> old-style multipolygons (whe
Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> > From: Jochen Topf
> > To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > In the last days the OpenSt
gt; From: Jochen Topf
> > To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
> > the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn
Jochen
cela ressemble a des menaces. Bon, il y a de meilleures façons de motiver les
communautés locales.
Bonne journée
Pierre
De : Jochen Topf
À : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : vendredi 30 juin 2017 3h53
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Hi!
A week ago I
g Group to remove the broken import.
>
> Jochen
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> > From: Jochen Topf
> > To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
> >
>
emove the broken import.
Jochen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> From: Jochen Topf
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
>
> Hi!
>
> In the last days the OpenStreet
an community steps up and fixes the data, automatically or
manually.
* We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import.
Jochen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> From: Jochen Topf
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> From: Jochen Topf
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
>
> Hi!
>
> In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
> the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn'
Hi!
In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn't take
old-style multipolygons (where the tags are on the outer ways instead of
on the relation) into account any more. In a huge effort in the last
months we have
41 matches
Mail list logo
