Hello:
Does anybody see any more problem areas?
Pretty much no more polygon problems I think. Or maybe I hope
Andrew / CancevImports
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 08:05 -0400, Andrew wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:27 -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> >
> > On 2017-07-17
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:27 -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> On 2017-07-17 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
> >
> >
> > There is a new layer with this data now in the OSMI:
> > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas=-64.28033=53.722
> > 07=8=same_tags_on_outer_ring
>
> Thanks, Jochen! That's
That is helpful!
Thank Jochen
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, 17 July, 2017 10:27
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> &g
On 2017-07-17 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> There is a new layer with this data now in the OSMI:
> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas=-64.28033=53.72207=8=same_tags_on_outer_ring
Thanks, Jochen! That's very helpful.
Looks like CanvecImports cleaned up many of the thousands of giant
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > How difficult would it be to add this to OSM inspector? Not everybody has
> > Postgres running, and is able to use osm2pgsql. Yes, there is documentation,
> > but it requires some technical skills. Also, it would be very convenient
data on this list.
Cheers,
Daniel
From: Begin Daniel [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 16:00
To: Alan Richards; Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Thanks everyone,
Stewart sent me an example I can use ☺
Daniel
From
Thanks everyone,
Stewart sent me an example I can use ☺
Daniel
From: Begin Daniel [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 09:53
To: Alan Richards; Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
If someone could provide me
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 00:51
To: Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Thanks for a good workflow - I cleared up 8 so far pretty quickly around Hope,
BC. There's a bunch in a cluster around Merritt too. I'm guessing it's
Thanks for a good workflow - I cleared up 8 so far pretty quickly around
Hope, BC. There's a bunch in a cluster around Merritt too. I'm guessing
it's certain imports or import authors vs others that makes the difference.
alarobric
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Stewart C. Russell
On 2017-07-02 04:41 PM, Begin Daniel wrote:
>
> However, since the same translator was used for all the polygons, the
> problem should also appear on water bodies, etc. The problem may have
> been related to the complexity of the polygons to convert.
Hi Daniel - yes, I'm seeing a bunch of water
://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9832.
-Original Message-
From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 1 July, 2017 17:43
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Hi James,
> Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, j
On 2017-07-01 05:22 PM, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> There is nothing specific about woods here.
It seems, though, that the root problem in Canada is *mostly* related to
woods imported from Canvec. And we have some very large forestry
relations indeed. I was finding that the JOSM process was using 13
Depends where you get the data I think, canvec from ftp is different from
canvec from toporama/atlas
On Jul 1, 2017 5:44 PM, "Stewart C. Russell" wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> > Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
>
> I've found a whole bunch of
Hi James,
> Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
I've found a whole bunch of Canvec 10 data with this problem west of
Sudbury. I think it may still be an issue with later versions.
Stewart
___
Talk-ca mailing list
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 04:04:25PM -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> On 2017-07-01 04:30 AM, Frank Steggink wrote:
> >
> > To all, this is the procedure I used yesterday, and probably something
> > similar also by Pierre.
> > * Not sure if it is a requirement, but it's better to use 64 bit Java.
On 2017-07-01 04:30 AM, Frank Steggink wrote:
>
> To all, this is the procedure I used yesterday, and probably something
> similar also by Pierre.
> * Not sure if it is a requirement, but it's better to use 64 bit Java.
> …
Thanks for this, Frank. I think I've found a way to make this a bit
es2...@gmail.com>
À : Frank Steggink <stegg...@steggink.org>
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>
Envoyé le : samedi 1 juillet 2017 8h25
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Error free Québec, just in time for Canada day! Good job Pierre :-)
On J
Error free Québec, just in time for Canada day! Good job Pierre :-)
On Jul 1, 2017 4:34 AM, "Frank Steggink" wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> Maybe a MapRoulette challenge might even not be necessary. Yesterday I
> started to clean up a bit in Québec, but since it was already past
Hi Jochen,
Maybe a MapRoulette challenge might even not be necessary. Yesterday I
started to clean up a bit in Québec, but since it was already past
midnight for me, I wanted to continue this morning. To my surprise
Pierre has done a lot of work and now the entire province of Québec
looks to
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:47:36PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> On 30-06-2017 21:21, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> > > Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see
> > > one
> > > case of old style
treetmap.org>
*Envoyé le :* vendredi 30 juin 2017 16h04
*Objet :* Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
If it's just removing tags, on inner polygons of a multipolygon, that
should be manageable in itself... is there a way you are querying for
said items without setting up a postgresql database
If we have a overpass query that Pierre provided, we can create a
maproulette task...then everyone can contribute! I can read up on how to
create a task or ask Martjin
---
Si nous avons un query overpass que Pierre nous ont fournit, on pourrais
créer une tache maproulette...pour que tout le monde
On 30-06-2017 21:21, Jochen Topf wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see one
case of old style multipolygon, in Manitoba. Last week, when you posted your
original message, I just saw one case
penStreetMap <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>
Envoyé le : vendredi 30 juin 2017 16h04
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
If it's just removing tags, on inner polygons of a multipolygon, that should be
manageable in itself... is there a way you are querying for said items without
setti
If it's just removing tags, on inner polygons of a multipolygon, that
should be manageable in itself... is there a way you are querying for said
items without setting up a postgresql database?
On Jun 30, 2017 3:57 PM, "James" wrote:
> To be fairyour example is from
To be fairyour example is from Canvec 4.0.that's reaaallly
oldwas it possible that was a way of tagging back in the days? Or was
it created initially as a polygon and was later converted to a relation?
Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
On
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see one
> case of old style multipolygon, in Manitoba. Last week, when you posted your
> original message, I just saw one case in New Brunswick. IIRC, it was a
t;>>because every user of the data has to work around this or handle the
>>>complaints.
>>> * The Canadian community steps up and fixes the data, automatically or
>>>manually.
>>> * We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import.
>>&g
remove the broken import.
>>
>> Jochen
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
>>> From: Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>
>>> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>>
2 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
From: Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Hi!
In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn't take
old-style mult
munity steps up and fixes the data, automatically
or
>
> manually.
>
> * We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import.
>
>
>
> Jochen
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:
e broken import.
>
> Jochen
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> > From: Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>
> > To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
&
un 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> > From: Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>
> > To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
> > the OSMF tile
Jochen
cela ressemble a des menaces. Bon, il y a de meilleures façons de motiver les
communautés locales.
Bonne journée
Pierre
De : Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>
À : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : vendredi 30 juin 2017 3h53
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon pr
a, automatically or
> manually.
> * We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import.
>
> Jochen
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> > From: Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>
>
manually.
* We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import.
Jochen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> From: Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon p
lt;joc...@remote.org>
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
>
> Hi!
>
> In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
> the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn't take
> old-style multipolygons (whe
Jun 2017 11:38:15 +0200
> From: Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org>
> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
>
> Hi!
>
> In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
> the OSMF tile servers. This new version of t
Hi!
In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn't take
old-style multipolygons (where the tags are on the outer ways instead of
on the relation) into account any more. In a huge effort in the last
months we
39 matches
Mail list logo