Hello:
Does anybody see any more problem areas?
Pretty much no more polygon problems I think. Or maybe I hope
Andrew / CancevImports
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 08:05 -0400, Andrew wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:27 -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> >
> > On 2017-07-17 10
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 11:27 -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> On 2017-07-17 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
> >
> >
> > There is a new layer with this data now in the OSMI:
> > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.28033&lat=53.722
> > 07&zoom=8&overlays=same_tags_on_outer_ring
>
> Th
That is helpful!
Thank Jochen
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, 17 July, 2017 10:27
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> &g
On 2017-07-17 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> There is a new layer with this data now in the OSMI:
> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.28033&lat=53.72207&zoom=8&overlays=same_tags_on_outer_ring
Thanks, Jochen! That's very helpful.
Looks like CanvecImports cleaned up many of the
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > How difficult would it be to add this to OSM inspector? Not everybody has
> > Postgres running, and is able to use osm2pgsql. Yes, there is documentation,
> > but it requires some technical skills. Also, it would be very convenient to
data on this list.
Cheers,
Daniel
From: Begin Daniel [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 16:00
To: Alan Richards; Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Thanks everyone,
Stewart sent me an example I can use ☺
Daniel
From
Thanks everyone,
Stewart sent me an example I can use ☺
Daniel
From: Begin Daniel [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 09:53
To: Alan Richards; Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
If someone could provide me with an
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 00:51
To: Stewart C. Russell
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Thanks for a good workflow - I cleared up 8 so far pretty quickly around Hope,
BC. There's a bunch in a cluster around Merritt too. I'm gue
Thanks for a good workflow - I cleared up 8 so far pretty quickly around
Hope, BC. There's a bunch in a cluster around Merritt too. I'm guessing
it's certain imports or import authors vs others that makes the difference.
alarobric
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> On 2
On 2017-07-02 04:41 PM, Begin Daniel wrote:
>
> However, since the same translator was used for all the polygons, the
> problem should also appear on water bodies, etc. The problem may have
> been related to the complexity of the polygons to convert.
Hi Daniel - yes, I'm seeing a bunch of water r
://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9832.
-Original Message-
From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 1 July, 2017 17:43
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Hi James,
> Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, j
On 2017-07-01 05:22 PM, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> There is nothing specific about woods here.
It seems, though, that the root problem in Canada is *mostly* related to
woods imported from Canvec. And we have some very large forestry
relations indeed. I was finding that the JOSM process was using 13 G
Depends where you get the data I think, canvec from ftp is different from
canvec from toporama/atlas
On Jul 1, 2017 5:44 PM, "Stewart C. Russell" wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> > Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
>
> I've found a whole bunch of Canvec 10 data with th
Hi James,
> Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
I've found a whole bunch of Canvec 10 data with this problem west of
Sudbury. I think it may still be an issue with later versions.
Stewart
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Ta
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 04:04:25PM -0400, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
> On 2017-07-01 04:30 AM, Frank Steggink wrote:
> >
> > To all, this is the procedure I used yesterday, and probably something
> > similar also by Pierre.
> > * Not sure if it is a requirement, but it's better to use 64 bit Java.
On 2017-07-01 04:30 AM, Frank Steggink wrote:
>
> To all, this is the procedure I used yesterday, and probably something
> similar also by Pierre.
> * Not sure if it is a requirement, but it's better to use 64 bit Java.
> …
Thanks for this, Frank. I think I've found a way to make this a bit
quick
s
À : Frank Steggink
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Envoyé le : samedi 1 juillet 2017 8h25
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Error free Québec, just in time for Canada day! Good job Pierre :-)
On Jul 1, 2017 4:34 AM, "Frank Steggink" wrote:
Hi Jochen,
Maybe a MapRoulette
Error free Québec, just in time for Canada day! Good job Pierre :-)
On Jul 1, 2017 4:34 AM, "Frank Steggink" wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> Maybe a MapRoulette challenge might even not be necessary. Yesterday I
> started to clean up a bit in Québec, but since it was already past midnight
> for me, I wa
Hi Jochen,
Maybe a MapRoulette challenge might even not be necessary. Yesterday I
started to clean up a bit in Québec, but since it was already past
midnight for me, I wanted to continue this morning. To my surprise
Pierre has done a lot of work and now the entire province of Québec
looks to
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:47:36PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> On 30-06-2017 21:21, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> > > Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see
> > > one
> > > case of old style multipolygon
ss facilities, commerce, fast foods :) Some nordic
villages are hundred of km apart. Should we ignore them?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=5/56.969/-83.979
regard
Pierre
*De :* James
*À :* Jochen Topf
*Cc :* Tal
If we have a overpass query that Pierre provided, we can create a
maproulette task...then everyone can contribute! I can read up on how to
create a task or ask Martjin
---
Si nous avons un query overpass que Pierre nous ont fournit, on pourrais
créer une tache maproulette...pour que tout le monde
On 30-06-2017 21:21, Jochen Topf wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see one
case of old style multipolygon, in Manitoba. Last week, when you posted your
original message, I just saw one case i
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Envoyé le : vendredi 30 juin 2017 16h04
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
If it's just removing tags, on inner polygons of a multipolygon, that should be
manageable in itself... is there a way you are querying for said items without
setting up
If it's just removing tags, on inner polygons of a multipolygon, that
should be manageable in itself... is there a way you are querying for said
items without setting up a postgresql database?
On Jun 30, 2017 3:57 PM, "James" wrote:
> To be fairyour example is from Canvec 4.0.that's reaa
To be fairyour example is from Canvec 4.0.that's reaaallly
oldwas it possible that was a way of tagging back in the days? Or was
it created initially as a polygon and was later converted to a relation?
Canvec 10.0 doesnt have the issues of double tagging, just overlapping
On J
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote:
> Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see one
> case of old style multipolygon, in Manitoba. Last week, when you posted your
> original message, I just saw one case in New Brunswick. IIRC, it was a park,
>>Especially when the only imagery available is Landsat
I remember the days when it was trudge out in the rain with the Garmin then
upload the GPS traces only to find a straight road was no longer straight
because of the wet leaves in the trees above.
Cheerio John
On 30 June 2017 at 15:03, J
Especially when the only imagery available is Landsat
On Jun 30, 2017 2:18 PM, "Frank Steggink" wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see
> one case of old style multipolygon, in Manitoba. Last week, when you posted
> your original messag
Hi Jochen,
Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see
one case of old style multipolygon, in Manitoba. Last week, when you
posted your original message, I just saw one case in New Brunswick.
IIRC, it was a park, not even from the Canvec import.
In the OSM inspect
User canvec_imports here :-)
What would you like me to say? Someone took the approach of
introducing my head to a 2x4 a few years back. Pretty much stopped me
dead in my tracks.
1: - I saw the original
On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 10:40 -0400, Stewart Russell wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
> > I w
But we could put a note in the OSM wiki where we point to the CANVEC files
saying don't bring in the polys.
Note to Stewart since you can be far more tactful than I and know the
proper technical terms could you drop something in and the French will need
covering as well.
Cheerio John
On 30 June
Hi Jochen,
I was waiting for user canvec_imports to say something, but there's been no
activity from the account for more than two years.
The import was started a long time ago, before there were import guidelines
and very likely before the licence change too. It was done with the best
available
As john has said, we only have a couple hundred mappers for 9.985 million
square kilometers...or 27.93 germanies or 41.17 United kindoms or 15.5
Frances. Europe has hundreds of thousands of mappers, Canada does not. If
you wish to help out you are more than welcome as a NTS Grid tile section
usuall
Doing nothing for the moment looks extremely good to me.
Compared to many other areas of the world such as Germany and the UK we
have many fewer mappers per square kilometer. As James has stated this
sort of clean up requires fairly specialised resources that realistically
we don't have in suffic
Jochen
cela ressemble a des menaces. Bon, il y a de meilleures façons de motiver les
communautés locales.
Bonne journée
Pierre
De : Jochen Topf
À : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : vendredi 30 juin 2017 3h53
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems
Hi!
A week ago I
https://i.imgur.com/8xKttYm.jpg
Image was ridiculously small
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 6:28 AM, James wrote:
> Example:
> https://i.imgur.com/8xKttYm_d.jpg
>
> Represents multiple thousand square kilometers of forest/objects. To
> actually be able to fix it correctly you NEED to launch JOSM in 64
Example:
https://i.imgur.com/8xKttYm_d.jpg
Represents multiple thousand square kilometers of forest/objects. To
actually be able to fix it correctly you NEED to launch JOSM in 64bit mode
with min/max memory values set or else it will crap out/freeze at 2GB of
memory. Now 1. JOSM doesnt document th
The problem that canvec has is multi polygons with different attributes
were stacked on top of eachother(i.e. hole in the forest that is also a
lake? That makes 2 polygons with same shape stacked one of top of
eachother... marshland+water+hole in forest? 3 polygons etc etc. Not that I
wouldnt live
Hi!
A week ago I wrote this email and nobody answered it yet. Does that
mean that nobody feels responsible for the import that created this data
and nobody here cares for this data?
I see three ways forward:
* We do nothing. The broken data stays in OSM. Not a good solution,
because every user
40 matches
Mail list logo
