Re: [Talk-ca] destination:street

I've also been using Mapbox's document as reference for exit signs and off ramps. I believe it makes a lot more sense to divide the tags into separate known entities instead of adding all of values into a single destination tag. The OSM tags seemed to be well described in their docs: -

Re: [Talk-ca] destination:street

Hey Martijn & everyone else, The bulk of destination:street was added beginning with Mapbox's "Mapping exit numbers and destinations in Canada", which described the methods to use [https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/220] Since then, most of us (me included) in Southern Ontario have just

Re: [Talk-ca] destination:street

Destination tags were added by mapbox for highways in Canada and the US: https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/adding-exit-and-destination-signs/ On Jan 19, 2017 8:02 PM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote: > Hi all, > > The Telenav mapping team noticed quite a few

[Talk-ca] destination:street

Hi all, The Telenav mapping team noticed quite a few destination:street tags on (mostly) motorway_link off-ramps in Canada. This is an undocumented sub-tag of the destination tag so I am curious how it is being used and if there is some sort of consensus that is documented somewhere else than

Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] cardinal directions

Martijn van Exel > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Martijn van Exel > wrote: > I am trying to be consistent with the outcome of the discussion that we had > on talk-us a couple

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #339 10/01/2017-16/01/2017

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 339, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8619/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages