Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

2017-01-24 Thread James
The city of Ottawa has the same license as the city of Vancouver: http://vancouver.ca/your-government/open-data-catalogue.aspx#tab19099 Which seemed to have been deemed compatible, must we revert all vancouver imports as well? You have even stated that OGL-CA is compatible with ODBL in this mail

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

2017-01-24 Thread James
Paul your answer is not clear. what is it that the license(ODL i'm guessing?) would impose on top of ODBL? On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:52 PM, john whelan wrote: > So since it is the same license as the Feds which you have a letter of > interpretation saying its fine with

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

2017-01-24 Thread john whelan
So since it is the same license as the Feds which you have a letter of interpretation saying its fine with the exception of the Ontario Privacy laws does that mean the fed license is to be written off as well? Pity as I like my bus stops and CANVEC highways. Cheerio John On 24 January 2017 at

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

2017-01-24 Thread Paul Norman
On 1/21/2017 3:11 PM, Paul Norman wrote: On 1/20/2017 5:33 PM, john whelan wrote: Did you include permission for the bus stops as well? They are from the same source and the same licence. I think I might have included one pitch sport soccer. The pitch was mapped but the sport soccer was I

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Fwd: [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

2017-01-24 Thread James
The sources are now available on the city of Ottawa's website. As such was the major hurdle last time to proceed with the import and it is now taken care of (http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/urban-buildings) and the local community in agreement to proceed, we shall begin to do so in the coming days.