Paul your answer is not clear. what is it that the license(ODL i'm guessing?) would impose on top of ODBL?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:52 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > So since it is the same license as the Feds which you have a letter of > interpretation saying its fine with the exception of the Ontario Privacy > laws does that mean the fed license is to be written off as well? > > Pity as I like my bus stops and CANVEC highways. > > Cheerio John > > On 24 January 2017 at 20:38, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > >> On 1/21/2017 3:11 PM, Paul Norman wrote: >> >> On 1/20/2017 5:33 PM, john whelan wrote: >> >> Did you include permission for the bus stops as well? They are from the >> same source and the same licence. I think I might have included one pitch >> sport soccer. The pitch was mapped but the sport soccer was I must confess >> taken from their open data source. >> >> >> I kept it generic, not specifying a particular dataset. That way we'll >> have a final answer one way or the other and won't have to go back to them >> all the time. >> >> >> The initial answer was that the license would impose obligations on top >> of the ODbL, our distribution license. This would make the data >> incompatible. >> >> I have gotten back to them with some additional questions which might >> offer a way forwards and clarify the problems. If I can't get anywhere >> we'll have to decide what to do, but it will probably mean we can write off >> the City of Ottawa as a potential data source. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > -- 外に遊びに行こう！
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
