Re: [Talk-ca] destination:street

2017-01-19 Thread Denis Carriere
I've also been using Mapbox's document as reference for exit signs and off ramps. I believe it makes a lot more sense to divide the tags into separate known entities instead of adding all of values into a single destination tag. The OSM tags seemed to be well described in their docs: -

Re: [Talk-ca] destination:street

2017-01-19 Thread Kevin Farrugia
Hey Martijn & everyone else, The bulk of destination:street was added beginning with Mapbox's "Mapping exit numbers and destinations in Canada", which described the methods to use [https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/220] Since then, most of us (me included) in Southern Ontario have just

Re: [Talk-ca] destination:street

2017-01-19 Thread James
Destination tags were added by mapbox for highways in Canada and the US: https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/adding-exit-and-destination-signs/ On Jan 19, 2017 8:02 PM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote: > Hi all, > > The Telenav mapping team noticed quite a few

[Talk-ca] destination:street

2017-01-19 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi all, The Telenav mapping team noticed quite a few destination:street tags on (mostly) motorway_link off-ramps in Canada. This is an undocumented sub-tag of the destination tag so I am curious how it is being used and if there is some sort of consensus that is documented somewhere else than