On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Christian Koerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The conflict management could be simple, a new API call 'lock' could be
introduced to lock and unlock ways for editing (online editors only?).
I agree, that this would be solution, but good locking is really hard
to
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Apologies, as a non-German speaker I can only half-follow this
discussion through Google Translate, and I realise it's very rude to
post in English on a German-speaking list. I thought it would
nonetheless be valuable to follow up two points in particular, hope
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:52:27 +0100
Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andre Rechelt wrote:
Ich frage mich ganz einfach, was sich die Entwickler von Potlach
heraus nehmen, um im Gegensatz zu ALLEN ANDEREN direkt in der
Datenbank herumzupfuschen und nicht den Weg ?ber die API
Apologies, as a non-German speaker I can only half-follow this
discussion through Google Translate, and I realise it's very rude to
post in English on a German-speaking list. I thought it would
nonetheless be valuable to follow up two points in particular, hope
you don't mind.
Andre
My opinion as a newbie (potlatch josm user)...
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
There are two big issues with it. One is that for edit sessions lasting
more than a couple of seconds, there has to be conflict management. If
you're a JOSM user, then you are de facto a clued-up, computer-savvy
type,
5 matches
Mail list logo
