On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Christian Koerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The conflict management could be simple, a new API call 'lock' could be
> introduced to lock and unlock ways for editing (online editors only?).
I agree, that this would be solution, but good locking is really hard
to i
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:52:27 +0100
Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andre Rechelt wrote:
>
> > Ich frage mich ganz einfach, was sich die Entwickler von Potlach
> > heraus nehmen, um im Gegensatz zu ALLEN ANDEREN direkt in der
> > Datenbank herumzupfuschen und nicht den Weg ?be
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
> Apologies, as a non-German speaker I can only half-follow this
> discussion through Google Translate, and I realise it's very rude to
> post in English on a German-speaking list. I thought it would
> nonetheless be valuable to follow up two points in particular, hope
My opinion as a newbie (potlatch & josm user)...
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
> There are two big issues with it. One is that for edit sessions lasting
> more than a couple of seconds, there has to be conflict management. If
> you're a JOSM user, then you are de facto a clued-up, computer-savvy
> t
Apologies, as a non-German speaker I can only half-follow this
discussion through Google Translate, and I realise it's very rude to
post in English on a German-speaking list. I thought it would
nonetheless be valuable to follow up two points in particular, hope
you don't mind.
Andre Rech
5 matches
Mail list logo