That all sounds good, though if we add stops to route relations do they
really need route_ref?
Tom
On Mar 23, 2010 10:26 PM, "Christoph Böhme" wrote:
Tom Chance schrieb:
> On 23 March 2010 13:20, Christoph Boehme wrote: > > >
Well, I just updated t...
Yes, exactly. My current plan is to have
The route ref is an interim data level until the relations are added. Think of
it as house numbers being initially added as points, and then full building
outlines being added at a later stage at which point the building number gets
transferred to the building outline.
Shaun
On 24 Mar 2010, at
That makes sense. So if a bus stop has one or more relations added, should
it be counted as equivalent to a route_ref tag in the colour scheme, i.e.
not marked as needing a route_ref tag?
You could also check if there are relations matching up to route_ref entries
for areas where they were put in.
The route_ref tag is extremely useful in the west midlands because all
physical bus stops carry the full list of route numbers visiting the stop on
the sign plate, this makes data gathering on the ground very easy and
generally I don't set up the route relation until I've done all the stops in
an a
I'll bring this up at our monthly mappa-mercia social next week as our group
would also benefit from a chapter and it might be there is enough interest
within to getting one up and running.
It would be good to hear from the London and other close knit groups on
their views/support?
Cheers
Andy
The only reason I prefer a verified=yes rather than the tag deleted is that
at least it tells me the stop is verified. If the tag is deleted it might be
verified or might be that the tag was deleted.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb
(No connection with the company other than I've bought a copy)
It doesn't seem to have been mentioned here, but Viewranger
(www.viewranger.com) now support Open Street Map and Open Cycle Map in their
software.
See press release:
http://www.viewranger.com/newsitem.php?nid=33
Alex.
___
On 24/03/2010 08:57, Tom Chance wrote:
> That makes sense. So if a bus stop has one or more relations added, should
> it be counted as equivalent to a route_ref tag in the colour scheme, i.e.
> not marked as needing a route_ref tag?
Yes, that would be good. However, this would require a bit of wor
8 matches
Mail list logo
