- Original Message -
From: "Mike Collinson"
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions."
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] UK mapping authority switches to Open
Government Licence
At 02:47 PM 7/01/2011, David Groom wrote:
- Original
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Fairhurst"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...
Mike Collinson wrote:
Also, if you are wanting to click the magic button because you have
been holding back with OS
Mike Collinson wrote:
> Also, if you are wanting to click the magic button because you have
> been holding back with OS data in your contributions ... David Groom
> has just pointed out that the OS have not released their data under
> the Open Government License at all but their own license whi
At 02:47 PM 7/01/2011, David Groom wrote:
>>- Original Message - From: "Mike Collinson"
>>In the case of the UK OS, there is a switch from a potential requirement for
>>level 4 attribution to a clear requirement for level 1, so the Open
>>Government Licence is definitely good news for hand
At 02:52 PM 7/01/2011, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>Richard Mann wrote:
>> Ah. So maybe I did miss something. Are those now the CTs I'm
>> agreeing to if I click the magic button?
>
>I believe (I'm not on LWG) that the intention is to give them one more
>tidying-up review and then make them live beh
Richard Mann wrote:
> Ah. So maybe I did miss something. Are those now the CTs I'm
> agreeing to if I click the magic button?
I believe (I'm not on LWG) that the intention is to give them one more
tidying-up review and then make them live behind the magic button. I don't
think they're there yet.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Attribution is guaranteed by the Contributor Terms (section 4), which
> continue regardless of the licence chosen.
>
> In addition, the latest version of the CTs (1.2.3, at
> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1sC0SrG_R6OkRDdC3IJKlmDE
Richard Mann wrote:
> But (unless I've missed something) that doesn't deal with the
> issue that the CTs reserve the right to switch the data to
> (amongst other things) a non-attribution licence at a future date.
Attribution is guaranteed by the Contributor Terms (section 4), which
continue re
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:57 PM, David Groom wrote:
> Perhaps the answer is that if at some time in the future a new licence was
> proposed, and OSMF is aware that there is data in the DB which would be
> incompatible with that proposed future licence, and they are unable to
> identify and remove t
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Mann"
To: "Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...
But (unless I've missed something) that doesn't deal with the issue
that the CTs reserve th
But (unless I've missed something) that doesn't deal with the issue
that the CTs reserve the right to switch the data to (amongst other
things) a non-attribution licence at a future date.
Richard
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Peter Miller wrote:
> The OS have today switched to the Open Governm
11 matches
Mail list logo
