It is nice to see, but does show up my mapping of Hartlepool - as you zoom
in you go from OS rendering that includes lots of crude outlines of
buildings, garden boundaries etc., to OSM.which doesn't.I must try
to interest some school children to do some tracing - I am far to lazy!
Still, a
Rob wrote:
> I don't see this. Right and Left tell you where the lane is, but
it does not
> tell a user (or routing software) which direction you can ride in.
This
> requires knowledge of which side of the road each country drives
on
> (or forward/backward tags).
Ah, yes. I see your point.
I
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Andy Allan wrote:
On 18 June 2012 14:10, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) wrote:
>
> Will the errors/discrepancies we identify be fed back to the DfT?
Unless Martin knows more than I do, then in all honesty I doubt it. I'm
hoping instead that whenever the DfT next want cycling d
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Tom Chance wrote:
This looks like a great project.
Can you clarify the situation in London? I don't really know what areas
the "SuperLondonBorough" sets cover. I added some hints to the wiki as to
where each of them open, then went from the one that starts in Sydenham
On 18 June 2012 10:58, Ed Loach wrote:
> Also, I'm not up on cycleway lane tagging, and on a section where
> there are lanes both sides, is cycleway:left=lane and
> cycleway:right=lane correct, as per merge tool suggestions? Also,
> the merge tool is showing a suggest of Lane with a capital letter
On 18 June 2012 14:37, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> 'Left'/'Right' is then based on the direction of the
> way, therefore you will need to make sure that OSM's and DfT's ways are
> drawn in the SAME DIRECTION before merging!
They should be. In some cases you'll find the DfT data tagged with
"oneside" e
On 18 June 2012 14:35, Andy Allan wrote:
> On 17 June 2012 18:30, Tom Chance wrote:
> > It would be really helpful if the snapshot server could render a map
> showing
> > where the remaining unmerged data is located.
>
> That's a good idea, and it's something I've now added to the issues list.
>
On 18 June 2012 14:10, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) wrote:
>
> smurph wrote
>> I've just been looking through the CUBA data and I think we need to show
>> that a route is part of a relation (specifically NCNs - which are mostly
>> done by relation in the Bristol area) to avoid someone retagging all of
>Also, I'm not up on cycleway lane tagging, and on a section where
>there are lanes both sides, is cycleway:left=lane and
>cycleway:right=lane correct, as per merge tool suggestions? Also,
>the merge tool is showing a suggest of Lane with a capital letter,
>which I think should be lower case.
>
>Ed
On 17 June 2012 18:30, Tom Chance wrote:
> It
> would be really helpful if the snapshot server could render a map showing
> where the remaining unmerged data is located.
That's a good idea, and it's something I've now added to the issues list.
https://github.com/gravitystorm/snapshot-server/iss
smurph wrote
> I've just been looking through the CUBA data and I think we need to show
> that a route is part of a relation (specifically NCNs - which are mostly
> done by relation in the Bristol area) to avoid someone retagging all of
> the ways as NCN when they are already part of an NCN relati
Phil,
The more the merrier!
Cheers
Andy
From: phil.pe...@gmail.com [mailto:phil.pe...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Philip
John
Sent: 18 June 2012 13:37
To: Andy Robinson
Cc: talk-gb-westmidla...@openstreetmap.org; Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] National Memori
How do footpaths work legally with textual descriptions?
If a field has a stile/gate at opposite corners. The footpath may have
originally cut across, legally the landowner has to allow access between
the two gates, but can he make people walk round the edge of his field.
Also in reverse, if the fo
I'd be tempted to convert the cycleway=lane into cycleway:left=lane and
cycleway:right=lane anyway, since (if I understand it right), it's
relatively easy to tag-transform it back again, for data users who can only
use symmetrical stuff. The capital letter is wrong though.
Richard
On Mon, Jun 18,
One last comment for now.
When looking at a project page, such as:
http://gravitystorm.dev.openstreetmap.org/cnxc-snapshot/projects/78/
tagged_ways
It would be good to have a link to edit a relevant area, or failing
that at least a latitude/longitude so you can find the way. I've
followed the two
On 18 June 2012 10:31, Andy Robinson wrote:
> We have a micro mapping party proposed for this Saturday to the National
> Memorial Arboretum [1] at Alrewas, Staffs [2].
> Our plan is to improve our own detail and get as many of the memorials on
> OpenStreetMap as possible (there are hundreds!)
S
On 18/06/2012 11:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
www.streetmap.co.uk - one of the two first UK mapping sites (along
with Multimap) - has started using OSM. Their 1:5k layer is now
OSM-based outside London, where they still use A-Z. Custom cartography
in quite an A-Z-like style!
Good news.
Do yo
They credit "Open Street Map" rather than "OpenStreetMap".
--
Barry Cornelius
http://www.northeastraces.com/
http://www.thehs2.com/
http://www.rowmaps.com/
http://www.oxonpaths.com/
http://www.barrycornelius.com/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@opens
Hi we will be having a pub social in Edinburgh
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Edinburgh#Social_Events
We have been offered a photo lab with a wikipedia group, date still to be
arranged.
Cheers
Bob___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.or
Hi,
On 06/18/2012 12:05 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
www.streetmap.co.uk - one of the two first UK mapping sites (along with
Multimap) - has started using OSM. Their 1:5k layer is now OSM-based
outside London, where they still use A-Z. Custom cartography in quite an
A-Z-like style!
Maybe they
www.streetmap.co.uk - one of the two first UK mapping sites (along with
Multimap) - has started using OSM. Their 1:5k layer is now OSM-based
outside London, where they still use A-Z. Custom cartography in quite an
A-Z-like style!
cheers
Richard
___
Also, I'm not up on cycleway lane tagging, and on a section where
there are lanes both sides, is cycleway:left=lane and
cycleway:right=lane correct, as per merge tool suggestions? Also,
the merge tool is showing a suggest of Lane with a capital letter,
which I think should be lower case.
Ed
We have a micro mapping party proposed for this Saturday to the National
Memorial Arboretum [1] at Alrewas, Staffs [2]. I'm now available so will be
able to make it and I'll do a little planning this week to smooth the day.
It would be handy to get an idea of numbers who are planning to come along
Are there any notes I'm missing about how to access and deal with
nodes in the DfT data? e.g.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/edloach/7392860104/in/photostream
Ed
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin - CycleStreets [mailto:list-osm-talk-
> g...@cyclestreets.net]
> Sent: 17 June 2012 12:44
> T
24 matches
Mail list logo
