Thanks for letting us know.
Based on the progress of the Coventry public realm improvements and this
cross-reference photo [1], I would date the imagery as circa 27th March
2012.
In Coventry, as with the previous imagery, there may be a small offset. If
you use Ordnance Survey data released
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 17:25 +, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Thanks for letting us know.
Based on the progress of the Coventry public realm improvements and
this cross-reference photo [1], I would date the imagery as circa 27th
March 2012.
I am in North Shropshire, it certainly looks like this
On 28 Feb 2013 23:08, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
...looks excellent as a get away from it all destination...
Bring some good boots as it's pretty muddy after 6 months of rain.
Kevin
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Looks like I'm missing something here as I always assumed Dartmoor was a moor,
given its name. Is there a reason for moors being tagged as heaths?
There are some moors, in name, locally which need mapping.
Dudley
Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013 23:08, SomeoneElse
On 1 Mar 2013 13:48, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
Looks like I'm missing something here as I always assumed Dartmoor was a
moor, given its name. Is there a reason for moors being tagged as heaths?
http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/protectedsites/sacselection/sac.asp?EUcode=UK0012929
Hi
Has anyone looked at using TNDS (http://traveline.info/tnds.html) as a
basis for importing bus routes into OSM? I've had a quick look at the data
and it looks like it would be possible to extract at least the stop
ordering for each route. In theory it can also have the road routes between
* How accurate is the data already in OSM?
Interesting question Rob, as of today there's approximately 200,000 ways or
nodes tagged with postcodes in OSM, this is made up of about 29,000 unique
postcodes. Those numbers are not 100% accurate as my bounding box for
getting the data overlaps a bit
That's an interesting list for anyone who is concerned with data cleansing!
Some of the results are because only the first part of a postcode has been
entered, however even these have numerous formats (e.g. CV3, CV3 ???, CV3
///). For the other errors, it tends to be typos (e.g. CO!6 7BJ, where !
On 31 Oct 2012, at 16:02, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 31/10/2012 15:29, Andy Robinson wrote:
Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote:
Sent: 31 October 2012 15:21
To: Matt Williams
Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous
9 matches
Mail list logo
