Andy, so what is your suggestion right now, do this manually or with
automated tools? Personally, I only did a few reverts using the JOSM
plugin, only reverting an entire changeset, not selectively as you seem
to suggest here. I have no experience with the other tools you mention.
Would the to
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:35:05PM -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> I think it's very unlikely, however, that these users are editing OSM for a
> company. Probably the majority of edits in the UK are done by what you might
> call "lone mappers". Generally this works well and people plough their
On 08/02/2017 21:46, Brian Prangle wrote:
Might we tackle this task under the general heading either of "landuse
fixes" or "uplands" as our next quarterly project?
I thought that was going to be to survey all those "Pokemon parks" :)
Cheers,
Andy
__
I came across glucosamine during the farmyards quarterly projectwhere
she/he'd tagged place=farm to every group of isolated buildings all over
Herefordshire. I think he/she means well just misinterprets tagging
conventions and then rolls on regardless.
Might we tackle this task under the general h
Marco Boeringa wrote:
> There may be more... All of these "users" are prolific, leave almost
> no changeset comments, and seem to be editing all day. It seems
> to me these are editors working professionally for some OSM
> related company.
Thanks for the detective work and for persisting with t
On 08/02/2017 20:46, Marco Boeringa wrote:
- Sam888, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413378224
- Glucosamine: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405845733
- Dyserth: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388818928
There may be more... All of these "users" are prolific, leave almost
no changes
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:30:03PM +, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Be bold! If you know the area and in your opinion it's junk then delete
> it. I've done a couple of areas in Shopshire I know. I don't know what the
> consensus is for tagging so I added a placeholder of
> landuse=unimproved_grassla
According to http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871
edits in Brazil, Russia, the United Arab Emirates and Senegal have also
attracted criticism from locally knowledgeable mappers, looking like someone
who is at best out of their depth.
--
Andrew
_
Hi all,
I now had a very preliminary and short look at some of the changesets
involved in the Wales area, which was revealing. I now noticed most of
these features seem to have been added by multiple users / accounts:
- Sam888, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413378224
- Glucosamine: h
Hi Michael
Not sure what the process is now - it was so long ago we did the last one.
Can anyone help Michael?
Regards
Brian
On 3 February 2017 at 23:22, Michael Booth wrote:
> On a related note, what is the process for getting an import in places
> that don't already have NAPTAN data? I'd be
Be bold! If you know the area and in your opinion it's junk then delete
it. I've done a couple of areas in Shopshire I know. I don't know what the
consensus is for tagging so I added a placeholder of
landuse=unimproved_grassland. What should we be tagging with?
On 8 February 2017 at 13:09, ael
Good thinking Christian.
>From the comments we might also monitor the progress of #GeoChicas with
getting more women involved with OSM.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 at 13:22 Christian Ledermann <
christian.lederm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for crossposting, I thought this is valuable information
>
> ---
Sorry for crossposting, I thought this is valuable information
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin Dittus
Date: 8 February 2017 at 00:34
Subject: [HOT] Study: validation feedback can provide important social
affirmation
To: HOT List
After my talk at State of the Map in Brussel
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:22:30AM +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 08/02/2017 10:49, Brian Prangle wrote:
> > It would be great in my opinion if we moved on as a community and
> > actually decided to act on our discussions.
I agree that at least those changes that have not been subsequently
modi
On 08/02/2017 10:49, Brian Prangle wrote:
It would be great in my opinion if we moved on as a community and
actually decided to act on our discussions.
Well I fixed the northern boundary of the Merthyr "Heath" where it
overlapped with stuff that I was mapping a couple of months ago :)
Serio
Hi Brian,
Yes, I would especially second Jerry's good comments in the previous
discussion thread he started about sticking to a "strict" definition of
heath as being characterized by species of the Ericacea
(http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/natural-heath-td5888994.html). This is
also a quite co
Hi everyone
Looks like a challenge. We have discussed this before and there were lots
of very thoughtful and knowledgeable opinions, but no decisions on any
actions. I kind of got the consensus that many were uncomfortable with the
spread of heathland landuse data but we never decided to do anyth
Hi David,
I know the opinions about the need to create multipolygons are as
diverse as there are political opinions. It was just one example where
these features cause issues. My main question is simply if there are any
plans or ideas by the British community of how to deal with these
feature
18 matches
Mail list logo
