On 27/08/18 06:05, Martin Wynne wrote:
I don't think it's for those who have mapped something in OSM to
demonstrate majority support for its retention. I think it is for those
seeking to have others' contributions removed to demonstrate a clear
consensus in favour of deletion.
Should this
Detals :https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Pub_Meetup
Jerry
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
I think this needs discussing on its own merits, because the argument being
made here is different to the usual argument for adding historical
features. The OP and others have made clear that the motivation lies not in
recording now-disappeared historical features, but in mapping traditional
On 2018-09-18 15:47, Dave F wrote:
> As Frederick & others point out - It will open the floodgates for other
> irrelevant data to be added.
Relevance is not at issue here - that is far too subjective. The point
is that the "OSM Community" is making a decision that this data is not
within the
Hi all.
There's appears to be a misguided belief this hasn't been discussed
previously. It has, numerous times, and the consensus of those who took
part was so clear it's now included in the first page every new users sees.
I feel there is nothing to discuss/vote on as it all been said &
His,
I think I said earlier in the thread but I've never viewed OSM as a strict
majority rule, more a do-ocracy or rule by consensus. Certainly, I think
anybody proposing the deletion of others' mapping ought to be sure of clear
community consensus, not just a mere majority opinion. Future
Hi,
On 18.09.2018 10:04, Dan S wrote:
> Though I've no particular expertise to add, this thread has tipped me
> in favour of being happy with these boundaries. Colin very rightly
> emphasised process - how do we come to some decision rather than
> simply expressing our views and then sitting back
Though I've no particular expertise to add, this thread has tipped me
in favour of being happy with these boundaries. Colin very rightly
emphasised process - how do we come to some decision rather than
simply expressing our views and then sitting back waiting for it to
erupt again in 18 months?
8 matches
Mail list logo
