His, I think I said earlier in the thread but I've never viewed OSM as a strict majority rule, more a do-ocracy or rule by consensus. Certainly, I think anybody proposing the deletion of others' mapping ought to be sure of clear community consensus, not just a mere majority opinion. Future mappers should not be bound by the views of 7/12 mappers participating in a Loomio vote in 2018.
Kind regards, Adam On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, 09:11 Dan S, <danstowell+...@gmail.com> wrote: > Though I've no particular expertise to add, this thread has tipped me > in favour of being happy with these boundaries. Colin very rightly > emphasised process - how do we come to some decision rather than > simply expressing our views and then sitting back waiting for it to > erupt again in 18 months? I'm not a big one for voting eg on tagging > but this seems to be a great case for a Loomio vote or a wiki vote, as > has already been suggested. Can someone perhaps set one up? Maybe a > Loomio vote, and we'd probably want to paste its outcome into the wiki > after to make sure it wasn't lost? > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
