BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20201017T12Z
DTEND:20201017T14Z
DTSTAMP:20201010T101315Z
ORGANIZER;CN=rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com:mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
UID:32m0vq2g8ek8vf3pgqh66m5..
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20200704T18Z
DTEND:20200704T19Z
DTSTAMP:20200701T230918Z
ORGANIZER;CN=rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com:mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
UID:5cddejfqeb9rufklcp03jfj..
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20200704T18Z
DTEND:20200704T19Z
DTSTAMP:20200701T230344Z
ORGANIZER;CN=rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com:mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
UID:5cddejfqeb9rufklcp03jfj..
Hi all,
Circulation: "Announce", "Initial working group" and "talk-gb"
We had our second OSM UK group concall today. Thanks to all who were able
to join or share comments beforehand.
Everything you need to is on the wiki [1] including the latest minutes and
actions [2]
Best regards,
Rob
Hi all,
cc: talk-gb
Not wanting to distract you from the UK quarterly project to map schools,
however there are a few bits related to the setting up of UK OpenStreetMap
group that we are still after comments for.
To make this easy I have collated everything you need at:
https://wiki.opens
Hi all,
Thanks for offering to help out as part of the initial working group for
the OpenStreetMap UK group.
(Also sent to: talk-gb)
Following our conference call there are a number of actions. This email
covers one (structures) and will be followed by emails on Objectives and
Constituti
All,
A bit more bilk mail from me (sorry).
As a reminder the first UK/GB OpenStreetMap group will shortly be starting
(at 8pm tonight). Joining details are as follows:
0800 22 90 900
Or 0330 336 2206
Passcode: 33224
Gregory has offered to help with the minutes, however I'm sure he would
Hi All,
I think the whole area classifies as a park
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Green). Further I don't follow the
argument of creating new tag keys. Without some form of discussion we risk
ending up with many different ways of doing the same thing (not good for
data consumers).
I
There is the boundary=reserve proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Reserve#Examples
But can you really call Millennium Greens, Doorstep Greens and CROW Open
Access Areas "reserves"? Not so sure. Having said that I do like the idea
of a boundary=something, designatio
Millennium Greens cover a wide range of on the ground usages. Same
are clearly gardens, some parks, some nature reserves. Please do not
retag these features to some perceived standard. I would also avoid
overloading the designation key - better to have an explicit key than
to reuse and existing
Hi Nick,
I agree that we don't want to take Hants data at face value and load this
into OSM where a path is already mapped. I have added my answers below:
Q1. Hampshire marked footpath and OSM footpath run very close to each other
(deviating by only a few meters max). No obvious marking on
Andy,
Thanks for the reminder email. Shame you can't make it - hope you get well
soon.
I'll be there from 8ish and hopefully a few others will be able to make it
too.
Rob
Ps I was hoping to ask you a bit more about the Government Open Data event
you posted to talk-gb-westmidlands. How us
Hi All,
As we have had a couple of releases of shapefile data in the recent months,
I have added some details to the relevant wiki pages to help those who are
interested in looking at these files. I find QGIS a great tool for
examining the data (and free):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi
Yep, you and me would have no problem doing that, but beginners may
struggle. Hence the suggestion to have the default changed to point to NLS
servers. That way it would be as simple as using the drop down menus in
Potlatch2 and JOSM.
Regards,
Rob
On , Andy Robinson wrote:
Rob, Not neces
Haha, I only mean well :-)
The issue came about from trying to improve the guidance provided on the UK
tagging guidelines. Currently I have copied over the guidance that already
existed (to the consultation page), however this was very limited and has
already had cries that foot=no is not c
Hi All,
I would like to improve the guidance given on the UK Tagging Guidelines
page in regards to how to map cycle paths. As a non-cyclist I would like
some advise. So far my research has found:
1. Definitions:
* "Cycle Lane" - lane marked out by painted lines _within_ the carriageway.
M
As noted there are some tools available to help find potential errors that
effect routing. Have a look on the QA page [1], specifically at keepright,
OSM Inspector and MapDust. As for editing OSM and proposing new tags,
OpenStreetMap works a bit like wikipedia - we have a very flat structure
Hi,
On the UK tagging guidelines consultation page [1] both Andrew C and
Richard M pointed out that the blue sign with a bicycle on it [2] does
_not_ imply foot=no. As I had copied this tag over from the original
guidelines page I would like to seek advice before removing the foot=no
comp
The third (and hopefully final) email from me today!
1) Thanks for the feedback on the tagging guidelines page. Lots of good
things and ideas (especially expanding to include more than just England),
for me to work on for the next iteration of this wiki page.
2) In regards to the idea for a
The second of a few emails from me today (apologies)!
As part of the Public Rights of Way work I have added a table of all the
English "surveying authorities" responsible for maintaining the Definitive
Map and Statement, to the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_local_councils
Ple
Hi,
I like the idea of having a wiki page with the list of authorities and
links to their Definitive Statement. Perhaps we could also have a column to
indicate whether they have agreed to release the data under a suitable
license (eg OGL).
Maybe we could mass mail a request out (combining
Hi All,
I spotted this by chance and doesn't look like it has been notified on this
mailing list yet:
Natural England (formally the Countryside Agency) has released GI data
under the Open Gov License (OGL) on April 1st 2012. The notification can be
viewed on their website:
http://www.nat
Thanks Richard, Andy,
Couple of points to feedback:
* Good point on the cycle paths along roads. I left this section mostly
unchanged from the original wiki page, but think we can easily add in the
details you raised.
* I might be 'brave' but am not brave enough to remove the UK Classic vs
Hi all,
It has been mentioned in the past (and I expect many others have thought
it), that the current UK Tagging Guidelines wiki page [1] is to confusing
for newcomers and data consumers alike. I have had a go at addressing this
by creating a new version of this page [2]. As discussed on t
24 matches
Mail list logo