On 12/02/16 23:01, John Aldridge wrote:
> You mean they serve the same function as not:name does for street names
> in reducing noise from automated consistency checking? OK, I can see
> that's useful.
>
>> But don't assume that the data
>> provided by the third party are more up to date than the
On 12 February 2016 at 09:51, Stuart Reynolds
wrote:
> As a side issue, does your tool currently ignore disused:amenity=* tags? If
> not, can it please. Thanks.
The tool only fetches amenity=school and amenity=college objects, so
disused:amenity=* (and other
A couple of areas where I think we could improve on our tagging to
help data users:
* I think it would be useful if we had a machine-readable way to tag
an amenity=school area that is actually a site shared between two or
more individual schools. In this case, while the area will probably be
On 12/02/16 10:51, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> That said, it's on my To Do list to look at doing a fuzzy name
> comparison -- probably by deleting common words / phrases (School,
> Academy, CofE, Voluntary Controlled, and, &, etc) from both strings
> and then seeing if what's left is
On 12-Feb-16 20:22, Lester Caine wrote:
On 12/02/16 19:34, John Aldridge wrote:
On 12-Feb-16 17:31, Lester Caine wrote:
I adopted the standard of official_name=xxx where the edubase listing
differs from the signage or other local 'format'...
I'm not objecting, but why did you feel you wanted
On 12/02/16 19:34, John Aldridge wrote:
> On 12-Feb-16 17:31, Lester Caine wrote:
>> I adopted the standard of official_name=xxx where the edubase listing
>> differs from the signage or other local 'format'...
>
> I'm not objecting, but why did you feel you wanted to clone information
> from
6 matches
Mail list logo