>
> From: Mark Goodge <m...@good-stuff.co.uk>
> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 20:48:18 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bottle Kilns
>
>
> On 06/04/2018 18:58, Brian Prangle wrote:
>
>> Hi Russ
>>
>>
On 06/04/2018 18:58, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi Russ
If any are listed buildings it would be good to tag them
heritage=2
heritage_operator=Historic England
listed_status = Grade I Grade II* or Grade II as appropriate
All surviving bottle kilns in Stoke-on-Trent are listed. But sometimes
Hi Russ
If any are listed buildings it would be good to tag them
heritage=2
heritage_operator=Historic England
listed_status = Grade I Grade II* or Grade II as appropriate
A good guide to listing status is
https://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/england/stoke-on-trent
Regards
Brian
On 6
There are more building=industrial so that may get some rendering
eventually.
And a kiln/bottle making is an industry so it does fit.
On 06/04/18 16:40, Russ Phillips wrote:
Forgot to add:
Elsewhere, someone suggested using kiln=bottle_kiln and
building=industrial instead of
Forgot to add:
Elsewhere, someone suggested using kiln=bottle_kiln and building=industrial
instead of building=bottle_kiln. Any thoughts?
Russ
On 6 April 2018 at 07:38, Russ Phillips
wrote:
> Right, I'm now thinking I'll tag as:
>
> building=bottle_kiln
>
Right, I'm now thinking I'll tag as:
building=bottle_kiln
kiln=pottery
disused:man_made=kiln
former_product=pottery
historic=kiln
and add tourism=museum where appropriate.
Ideally
I'd have the building as a way.
Then the kiln as a node with the product.
This allows the building to remain
On 06/04/18 03:04, Adam Snape wrote:
Hi,
How about disused as a lifecycle prefix rather than a simple tag eg.
disused:man_made=kiln
+1
I don't think much of disued=yes
* building=industrial
* kiln=bottle_kiln
* man_made=kiln
* product=pottery
* disused=yes
* historic=building
Which bit is
Hi,
How about disused as a lifecycle prefix rather than a simple tag eg.
disused:man_made=kiln
tourism=museum
Alternatively, how about using the historic tag to differentiate old kilns
from modern ones eg.
historic=kiln
tourism=museum
Kind regards,
Adam
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, 16:00 Paul Berry,
> Do we have precedence for handling such cases, in other types of
specialist buildings?
Not sure, but I'm now thinking about other kiln-like structures close to my
neck of the woods. Feel free to update the tagging on these accordingly:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catcliffe_Glass_Cone
On 5 April 2018 at 13:18, Russ Phillips wrote:
> I'm intending to map the bottle kilns in Stoke on Trent.
Don't forget that there are some in Stourbridge, too.
> Based on feedback from a few people, I'm planning to use the following tags,
> although I'm still
Looks fine to me, and the tag is in extensive usage.
This is roughly the tagging we have used for the disused one at West
Hallam:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=18/52.97438/-1.35346
.
My only qualm is about disused=yes. I presume this is very much the default
for bottle
On 05/04/2018 13:18, Russ Phillips wrote:
I'm intending to map the bottle kilns in Stoke on Trent. For those
that don't know, they're an important part of the area's industrial
heritage (there were several thousand of them at the height of the
pottery industry). There are 47 now, and just
Hi,
I'm intending to map the bottle kilns in Stoke on Trent. For those that
don't know, they're an important part of the area's industrial heritage
(there were several thousand of them at the height of the pottery
industry). There are 47 now, and just under half are currently mapped.
Based on
13 matches
Mail list logo