The Vector Map District data includes some nice features like rocks and
cliffs too (e.g http://maps.webhop.net/vmdmap/Hartlepool.png).
I haven't tried to get these into OSM yet though - that is just a rendering
of the OS data.
Graham.
On 16 September 2010 16:15, Chris Hill wrote:
> Craig Loftus
Craig Loftus wrote:
Which is more accurate: the OS Streetview data that shows MHW (spring, I
assume) or the PGS data?
I haven't used it for coast lines, but doesn't OS Vector District
include the high water mark? This would be the most 'accurate',
although not necessarily the most 'correc
On 16/09/2010 15:23, Craig Loftus wrote:
Which is more accurate: the OS Streetview data that shows MHW (spring, I
assume) or the PGS data?
I haven't used it for coast lines, but doesn't OS Vector District
include the high water mark? This would be the most 'accurate',
although not necessarily
Craig wrote:
> I haven't used it for coast lines, but doesn't OS Vector
> District
> include the high water mark?
It does (and I have, for both MHW and MLW; MHW as coastline, MLW as
extent of tidalflat multipolygon area).
Ed
___
Talk-GB mailing list
> Which is more accurate: the OS Streetview data that shows MHW (spring, I
> assume) or the PGS data?
I haven't used it for coast lines, but doesn't OS Vector District
include the high water mark? This would be the most 'accurate',
although not necessarily the most 'correct' source? Certainly bet
No firm answer for you, but I can tell you that I've had to move stretches of
coastline (around Newcastle) out to the MHW shown on the OS Streetview, as the
PGS coastline had me, my GPS trace and a couple of nearby buildings bobbing
about in the sea. :)
On 16 Sep 2010, at 02:43, "Dave F." wr
Hi
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline
Which is more accurate: the OS Streetview data that shows MHW (spring, I
assume) or the PGS data?
http://os.openstreetmap.org/?zoom=16&lat=51.26415&lon=-3.01719&layers=B0
Cheers
Dave F.
__
7 matches
Mail list logo
