alk-gb@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Disused or empty apartments
On 19/12/19 00:41, Mike Baggaley wrote:
> Perhaps setting both building=yes and disused: building=apartments
> would fulfill all the needs.
Err no. Having both tags
On 19/12/2019 02:09, Warin wrote:
On 19/12/19 13:01, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 19/12/2019 01:41, Andy Townsend wrote:
Aside from this particular question, that's actually a problem that
happens all the time with things like "amenity=pub; tourism=hotel" -
I'd rather the mapper make a
17 Dec 2019, 17:58 by silentspike...@gmail.com:
> The `building` tag actually specifies the original purpose or form of the
> building - it just happens that this usually aligns with the current use. As
> such, I think it's fine to leave them tagged as `building=apartments`.
>
I would do
On 19/12/19 13:01, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 19/12/2019 01:41, Andy Townsend wrote:
Aside from this particular question, that's actually a problem that
happens all the time with things like "amenity=pub; tourism=hotel" -
I'd rather the mapper make a clear choice as they know what is there,
On 19/12/2019 01:41, Andy Townsend wrote:
Aside from this particular question, that's actually a problem that
happens all the time with things like "amenity=pub; tourism=hotel" -
Not really. pub & hotel are synonymous but building=yes (which indicates
it's operational) is antonymous to
On 18/12/2019 23:47, Warin wrote:
On 19/12/19 00:41, Mike Baggaley wrote:
Perhaps setting both building=yes and disused: building=apartments
would fulfill all the needs.
Err no. Having both tags on the one object is contradictory.
How is it determined which tag to render?
Aside from this
On 19/12/19 00:41, Mike Baggaley wrote:
Perhaps setting both building=yes and disused: building=apartments
would fulfill all the needs.
Err no. Having both tags on the one object is contradictory.
How is it determined which tag to render?
A building=* is rendered one way.
A
isused or empty apartments prior to demolition
> (Robert Skedgell)
>
>
>--
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 20:54:24 +0000
>From: David Woolley
>To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Disu
On 17/12/2019 20:54, David Woolley wrote:
On 17/12/2019 20:35, Warin wrote:
so
building=apartments
becomes
disused:building=apartments
or
building=yes
becomes
disused:building=yes
I disagree. It is still a building. In fact some of the most
interesting buildings are disused ones.
On 17/12/2019 20:35, Warin wrote:
so
building=apartments
becomes
disused:building=apartments
or
building=yes
becomes
disused:building=yes
I disagree. It is still a building. In fact some of the most
interesting buildings are disused ones.
___
My understanding?
If the feature is disused then place disused: in front of the existing tag;
so
building=apartments
becomes
disused:building=apartments
or
building=yes
becomes
disused:building=yes
Having both disused:building=* and disused:building=* is a conflict, it
is disused or
The `building` tag actually specifies the original purpose or form of the
building - it just happens that this usually aligns with the current use.
As such, I think it's fine to leave them tagged as `building=apartments`.
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use. Interestingly
Change it to building=yes + disused:building=apartments ?...it's still a
building, but the original use is now disused?
- Jez
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, 14:51 Gareth L, wrote:
> There are some tower blocks near me which have been emptied of residents
> ahead of eventual demolition of the buildings.
There are some tower blocks near me which have been emptied of residents ahead
of eventual demolition of the buildings. They’re not coming back into use due
to issues with their construction.
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/lzDlWfY8iYo2cUVmO1FNmQ/photo They’re boarded up
to secure them in the
14 matches
Mail list logo
