Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: "Richard Fairhurst" To: Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 5:05 PM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today... Mike Collinson wrote: Also, if you are wanting to click the magic button because you have been holding

Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Mike Collinson wrote: > Also, if you are wanting to click the magic button because you have > been holding back with OS data in your contributions ... David Groom > has just pointed out that the OS have not released their data under > the Open Government License at all but their own license whi

Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread Mike Collinson
At 02:52 PM 7/01/2011, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >Richard Mann wrote: >> Ah. So maybe I did miss something. Are those now the CTs I'm >> agreeing to if I click the magic button? > >I believe (I'm not on LWG) that the intention is to give them one more >tidying-up review and then make them live beh

Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Richard Mann wrote: > Ah. So maybe I did miss something. Are those now the CTs I'm > agreeing to if I click the magic button? I believe (I'm not on LWG) that the intention is to give them one more tidying-up review and then make them live behind the magic button. I don't think they're there yet.

Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread Richard Mann
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Attribution is guaranteed by the Contributor Terms (section 4), which > continue regardless of the licence chosen. > > In addition, the latest version of the CTs (1.2.3, at > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1sC0SrG_R6OkRDdC3IJKlmDE

Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Richard Mann wrote: > But (unless I've missed something) that doesn't deal with the > issue that the CTs reserve the right to switch the data to > (amongst other things) a non-attribution licence at a future date. Attribution is guaranteed by the Contributor Terms (section 4), which continue re

Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread Richard Mann
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:57 PM, David Groom wrote: > Perhaps the answer is that if at some time in the future a new licence was > proposed, and OSMF is aware that there is data in the DB which would be > incompatible with that proposed future licence, and they are unable to > identify and remove t

Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: "Richard Mann" To: "Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today... But (unless I've missed something) that doesn't deal with

Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-07 Thread Richard Mann
But (unless I've missed something) that doesn't deal with the issue that the CTs reserve the right to switch the data to (amongst other things) a non-attribution licence at a future date. Richard On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Peter Miller wrote: > The OS have today switched to the Open Governm

[Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...

2011-01-06 Thread Peter Miller
The OS have today switched to the Open Government License which means that any remaining doubts of the compatibility of OS Open data with ODBL have been resolved as far as I can see. Details in the email below. Regards, Peter -- Forwarded message -- From: Tom Hughes Date: 6