On 3 June 2011 11:45, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
Hi all,
Some stats on OSM coverage of Kent. I tried to pair the records of KCC
OpenKent with the OSM database. Assuming the KCC list is complete (which it
is usually, but not entirely), we can estimate OSM's coverage in the
On 08/06/11 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
My experience is that the LWG never makes definitive statements!
I find that annoying sometimes but, if we are to follow to Spinoza's
example that we should made a ceaseless effort not to [...] scorn human
actions, but to understand them, LWG have to
On 08/06/2011 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
...
On a separate note. Would you be able to do a comparison between place
names in NatGaz and in OSM. I think we will be surprised how many
places we are still missing from OSM. My guess is that OSM only
contains about 65% of the 50K places in that
TimSC wrote:
On 07/06/11 14:37, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
You don't need to put stuff into OSM to make it mashable-uppable. Most
competent licences will have a Collective Work/Database provision to
enable this.
While this this strictly true it is sometimes hard to associate
external records
On 08/06/2011 15:58, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
TimSC wrote:
On 07/06/11 14:37, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
You don't need to put stuff into OSM to make it mashable-uppable. Most
competent licences will have a Collective Work/Database provision to
enable this.
While this this strictly true it is
TimSC wrote:
Straw man.
[...]
Sigh.
[...]
It is ridiculous
[...]
I guess I should not surprised you can't see the benefits
[...]
This seems to be a common thread of your arguments - you make wild claims
Fair enough. It's fairly evident you don't see stuff on the same wavelength
as I do.
On 8 June 2011 09:39, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
On 08/06/11 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
My experience is that the LWG never makes definitive statements!
I find that annoying sometimes but, if we are to follow to Spinoza's example
that we should made a ceaseless effort not to
From: TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Cc: Bob Kerr openstreetmapcraigmil...@yahoo.co.uk
Sent: Saturday, 4 June 2011, 11:56
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OpenKent, OSM coverage estimation
On 04/06/11 11:04, Bob Kerr wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way that we can request
TimSC wrote:
With complete lists of addresses, we can go and find exact positions
of these services. I am still unsure if this is compatible with the
relicensing.
If you go out and find the exact position of a service, with a piece of
paper and a pen (or a GPS or whatever), that's your
On 07/06/11 13:34, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
If you go out and find the exact position of a service, with a piece of
paper and a pen (or a GPS or whatever), that's your data, not theirs. So of
course it's compatible.
I think you miss my point. The datasets contain more than just their
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, 7 June 2011, 14:37
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OpenKent, OSM coverage estimation
TimSC wrote:
I think you miss my point. The datasets contain more than just their
postal address. If the licenses
On 07/06/11 14:37, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
TimSC wrote:
I think you miss my point. The datasets contain more than just their
postal address. If the licenses are compatible, we can mash up the data.
You don't need to put stuff into OSM to make it mashable-uppable. Most
competent
That looks like useful data. It looks to me like Edinburgh are not quite
embracing open data - the terms and conditions for the entire web site
is for personal and non-commercial use only. I stumbled on this recently:
http://openlylocal.com/councils/open
This list the councils that do open
On 07/06/11 16:02, TimSC wrote:
It depends on your definition of import (obviously). If you include
tracing, I traced 90% of SE London and then Semantic Tourist used that
in walking papers to survey it personally. Would that be an example?
It also fits my vision of import and improve.
Oops,
we make one?
Cheers
Bob
From: TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, 3 June 2011, 11:45
Subject: [Talk-GB] OpenKent, OSM coverage estimation
Hi all,
Some stats on OSM coverage of Kent. I tried to pair the records of KCC
On 04/06/11 11:04, Bob Kerr wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way that we can request the data in a standard easy to
use format, one that we can requested from different councils
throughout the uk.
That would be ideal because data standards enable sharing and use. On
the other hand, any barrier to
Hi all,
Some stats on OSM coverage of Kent. I tried to pair the records of KCC
OpenKent with the OSM database. Assuming the KCC list is complete (which
it is usually, but not entirely), we can estimate OSM's coverage in the
area.
Schools: 618 of 915 (915 (67.54 %)
Pharmacies: 67 of 274
17 matches
Mail list logo
