On 11 May 2012 13:09, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 May 2012 10:07, Robert Whittaker robert.whitta...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think this proposed tagging is particularly helpful as it
fails to distinguish between two issues: whether the way in question
is suspected of
On 12/05/12 13:02, Philip Barnes wrote:
They do vary between highway authorities, but well worth getting some
photos of samples. The one thing waymarks have in common, and I can only
claim knowledge of England and Wales here is that a public footpath has
yellow arrows, public bridleways have
Andrew Chadwick wrote:
Not a waymarker, but the signposts are fairly rare too; Public Byway
or just Byway is the normal wording
FWIW Derbyshire seem to have started (within the last 3 months or so)
using Byway Open to All Traffic in full on signs.
Cheers,
Andy
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 13:02 +0100, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 10:00 +0100, Robert Norris wrote:
I've added my 2 penneth.
Maybe we should gather more samples of signs - e.g. to show differing
Councils styles (and then hopefully agreed tagging) to give better
I've added my 2 penneth.
Maybe we should gather more samples of signs - e.g. to show differing Councils
styles (and then hopefully agreed tagging) to give better guidelines.
I've have a look my photos but I think I tend to delete these types of pictures
after use.
If I remember, next time
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 10:00 +0100, Robert Norris wrote:
I've added my 2 penneth.
Maybe we should gather more samples of signs - e.g. to show differing
Councils styles (and then hopefully agreed tagging) to give better guidelines.
I've have a look my photos but I think I tend to delete
Further to my earlier answer, Essex arrows tend to have the CC crest
on the arrow itself, and public footpath (or whatever) around the
top of the circle (if the arrow is pointing straight up). So I might
change my answer if there is *just* a yellow arrow, but again it may
vary by area.
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 18:22 +0100, Ed Loach wrote:
Further to my earlier answer, Essex arrows tend to have the CC crest
on the arrow itself, and public footpath (or whatever) around the
top of the circle (if the arrow is pointing straight up). So I might
change my answer if there is *just* a
On 10 May 2012 23:46, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
* It has previously been suggested that a suspected=* tag be used for
when a mapper is undecided. Unless there are objections, I will add
suspected=* (where * is one of the 4 options - public
footpath/bridleway/BOAT/RB) and
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
If the right of way is recorded in the Definitive Statement, then its
100% verifiable that it is indeed a right of way, and we can (given
permission to use the Statement) record that in OSM.
Indeed - but it's helpful if a source:designation indicates that, so
Thanks Richard Andy,
Just to address Andy's comment about new users tagging all footpaths as
designation=public_footpath regardless
of legal status (as they have seen it used elsewhere). Two points. First
Potlatch hides advanced tags away from the simple point and click drop down
menus; this may
Thanks for commenting/voting on which images provided enough evidence to
tag a way as a public footpath / public bridleway. I am pleased to see
that there was agreement on the simple cases. Others were not so clear cut
and I chuckled when I saw that a Undecided option had been added to the
voting
Hi All
Thanks for all the feedback on the UK tagging guidelines page. I have
collated all these together and will start to implement changes to the page
before reporting back here.
I would like to add a few more images to help new users identify public
rights of way. Can you please spend a
13 matches
Mail list logo
