On 13 October 2013 00:26, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/401
This block now appears to have expired, because the user is back to his/her
old tricks again:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19463227
Regards,
Tom
--
Tom Chance wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to get this user account suspended/banned:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Quercus1/edits
For info, I've just reverted
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18538612. See
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18542407 for details.
Tom Chance wrote:
On 23 September 2013 12:22, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
mailto:frede...@remote.org wrote:
It seems you have already repaired the most obvious damage yourself.
Of the changesets in my local area - others covered some other edits.
For info, I've just reverted
Hi,
For info, I've just reverted 18284889
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18284889 and 18284855
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18284885 by the same
user (comment = This is an area of unused land). They involved the
deletion of part of the A21.
Hello all,
I'm trying to get this user account suspended/banned:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Quercus1/edits
I have tried contacting him/her to no avail. All these edits are bogus and
many involve the deletion of features.
I emailed the DWG but got no response, and the wiki page is a bit
Hi,
On 09/23/13 12:39, Tom Chance wrote:
I emailed the DWG but got no response, and the wiki page is a bit
unclear as to whether this can be dealt with in the community (mailing
lists?) or by the DWG.
It seems you have already repaired the most obvious damage yourself.
Indeed DWG prefers it
On 23 September 2013 11:39, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
I'm trying to get this user account suspended/banned:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Quercus1/edits
Whilst, if they fail to respond to a direct approach, such steps may
be needed...
I have tried contacting him/her to no
OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
The edits seem to be seriously incompetent, rather than actually
bogus, or malicious.
What they've added is mostly just untagged ways (sometimes for
buildings, sometimes perhaps fences, sometimes unclear). I'd mostly
therefore mostly agree with incompetence rather
On 23 September 2013 12:22, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
It seems you have already repaired the most obvious damage yourself.
Of the changesets in my local area - others covered some other edits.
Indeed DWG prefers it if such issues can be resolved by the community
through
On 23 September 2013 12:27, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The edits seem to be seriously incompetent, rather than actually
bogus, or malicious.
I'm not sure, they are strange edits. On the one hand there are some
outlines of actual features, on the other hand there are
* random
On 23 September 2013 16:01, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
* changesets with the same comment that doesn't correspond with the
thing they have traced, like This is a House
Unfortunately, like subjects on many PC support forums, the average
contributor doesn't seem to be able
Can we check their IP? Didn't something similar happen with some Google
employees vandalizing OSM a few years ago?
Chris
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
On 23 September 2013 16:01, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
* changesets with the same
On 23/09/13 14:08, Tom Chance wrote: On 23 September 2013 12:27,
OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com
mailto:osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The edits seem to be seriously incompetent, rather than actually
bogus, or malicious.
I'm not sure, they are strange edits. On the one hand there are
On 23 September 2013 18:47, Peter Oliver p.d.oli...@mavit.org.uk wrote:
Didn't someone mention that this user was using JOSM? JOSM pre-populates
the comment field with the previously submitted comment.
The other thing it does is to add to an existing changeset, and the
changeset is left
Frederik Ramm wrote:
(the *ideal* but often utopian course of action being that the user
sees his mistake and fixes it himself!),
In my personal experience, mappers that are still engaged with the
project *1 normally do reply to a hello-and-welcome-but-by-the-way
message positively *2, and
15 matches
Mail list logo
