Re: [Talk-GB] Natural England Data

2013-05-02 Thread Dudley Ibbett
? Regards Dudley Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 23:15:48 +0100 From: rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Natural England Data Urrgg.. It was [0] that all Natural England open datasets (with the exception of Local Nature Reserves), were plain OGL licensed and could

Re: [Talk-GB] Natural England Data

2013-05-02 Thread Rob Nickerson
I guess one question might be, would it be a good idea to distinguish between statutory and non-statutory designations? The simpler the tagging, and the easier it is to explain, the more likely it will be used as you intend. So, although this may be a good idea, it would need some supporting text

Re: [Talk-GB] Natural England Data

2013-05-01 Thread Dudley Ibbett
Hi Am I correct in assuming we cannot use this data. It talks about OGL but also mentions 3rd party and OS (again!!) http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/publications/data/ The reason I ask is because whilst I can go around our neighbourhood and put in walls fences, woods etc I don't seem to

Re: [Talk-GB] Natural England Data

2013-05-01 Thread sk53.osm
The license terms seem fairly straightforward despite them adding Natural England in front of the name of each license. Virtually all the data of interest has been compiled from OSGB data (not maps, but probably using vector data) and therefore under current terms is released under the OSGB

Re: [Talk-GB] Natural England Data

2013-05-01 Thread Kevin Peat
Dudley, On 1 May 2013 19:42, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Am I correct in assuming we cannot use this data. It talks about OGL but also mentions 3rd party and OS (again!!) http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/publications/data/ This dataset was discussed on the list

Re: [Talk-GB] Natural England Data

2013-05-01 Thread Rob Nickerson
Urrgg.. It was [0] that all Natural England open datasets (with the exception of Local Nature Reserves), were plain OGL licensed and could therefore be used. Looking again, it seems like NE have now added that annoying line at the top of the OGL licence that seems be be raising a few eyebrows:

Re: [Talk-GB] Natural England data

2012-07-18 Thread David Fisher
Andy: Thanks for the confirmation. For the data that might not be compliant, I take it OGL is the terminology I'd look for as a check? RE Bulk imports: most certainly not!! Tom: There is a long, long list of England-wide shapefiles, each downloadable with a couple of clicks from