Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-10 Thread Robert Norris
@pacific-rim.net> Sent: 10 January 2017 01:17:24 To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref The prow:ref tag emerged from a discussion I started on this list about the problem of using the ref tag to refer to PROW references. The specific problem was that some high

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-10 Thread Dave F
With 31 993 occurrences prow_ref appears to be the agreed way to go. To check is FootpathX an official authority reference format? DaveF On 10/01/2017 16:02, Paul Berry wrote: So, convinced you were talking about me :) should I change *ref* to *prow_ref* on this and other footpaths I've

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-10 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 10 January 2017 at 16:02, Paul Berry wrote: > So, convinced you were talking about me :) should I change ref to prow_ref on > this and other footpaths I've tracked recently? > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464500797 I'd definitely recommend using prow_ref=* to

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-10 Thread Paul Berry
So, convinced you were talking about me :) should I change *ref* to *prow_ref* on this and other footpaths I've tracked recently? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464500797 Regards, *Paul* On 10 January 2017 at 11:05, Dave F wrote: > This thread: >

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-10 Thread Dave F
This thread: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017390.html Specifically this point by Andy R.: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017423.html As pointed out official_ref=* is a little to vague. It's always good to be specific as possible.

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-10 Thread Colin Smale
On 2017-01-10 10:04, Dave F wrote: > FYI The agreed tag for 'C' roads was highway_authority_ref as it was felt > there could be other official or authority tags. It's always good to be > specific. Where was that discussed/agreed? The wiki[1] says to use official_ref or admin_ref. //colin

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-10 Thread Dave F
On 10/01/2017 00:36, Robert Norris wrote: If I remember correctly the use of "prow_ref" tag is normally when the reference is taken from the Council ROW information documents that are compatible with OSM. 'ref' is used when the Reference itself is on the signed on the ground. Thus for the

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-09 Thread Andy Townsend
On 09/01/17 23:56, David Groom wrote: Has any one got any instances of any providers of OSM data using the prow_ref on rendering / routing A map style rather than a "provider of OSM data", but it seemed like a good idea so I added basic support at:

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-09 Thread David Groom
ot;Robert Norris" <rw_nor...@hotmail.com> To: "Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>; "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net> Sent: 10/01/2017 00:36:41 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref If I remember correctly the use of "pro

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

2017-01-09 Thread Robert Norris
If I remember correctly the use of "prow_ref" tag is normally when the reference is taken from the Council ROW information documents that are compatible with OSM. 'ref' is used when the Reference itself is on the signed on the ground. Thus for the Isle Of Wight, it is probably recommended to