> the "fair use" clause.
Which specific legislation are you referring to.
On 12 May 2017 17:10, "Ilya Zverev" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> First, I was amazed at the response. Thanks for constructive feedback,
> which I answer below, and no thanks for toxic responses, including
A few issues I have spotted with the proposed data,
Website: This should only be included if it refers to the actual object
and should not be set to the shell.co.uk site.
I have spotted some really silly street names, such as
addr:street=A46/A6 A46/A6 Trunk Road.
A filling station is often part
On 12 May 2017 at 17:08, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> I am not sure if I should add the brand:wikidata=Q154950 tag, and for now
> decided against that.
I would encourage you to include this.
> * "The general view seems to be against IDs like this": what has happened
> with the
Hi everyone,
First, I was amazed at the response. Thanks for constructive feedback, which I
answer below, and no thanks for toxic responses, including asking for money
(what money? We — as in maps.me — get none out of this) and imposing impossible
restrictions (manually investigate context for
I would be interested to add rights of way information closer to home
(Lancashire).
Dave refers to the long list of other councils that have released row
information. Is this the rowmaps website or is it somewhere on osm that I'm
missing?
The information on rowmaps is not clear. Is all of the
Hi everyone
Take a look at this amazing facility which is a development of our work
locally with ODI,Birmingham Innovation Centre and Deft351. It's still only
a demonstrator, developed by Opendatasoft, but I'm pretty impressed with
its visualisation capabilities
Apologies to Brian, who's clearly just passing on the message.
On 12/05/2017 00:58, Dave F wrote:
1. Wouldn't it be better to sort out your trees first?
2. What does ref_unused_tags.name refer to?
3. Are there any out of date stations that need removing/changing to
another operator?
DaveF
Dave,
On 12.05.2017 01:58, Dave F wrote:
> 1. Wouldn't it be better to sort out your trees first?
It's not OSM-UK that proposes this import; Brian has only pointed out
that there's a discussion going on. The import has been proposed by
commercial entities NavAds (who publicize store locations
for background info: a couple of links about Navads and what they do for
Shell (and other brands)
http://www.prweb.com/releases/navads/shell/prweb13779126.htm and
https://navads.eu/businesslistings/
It would be interesting for OSM[UK] to be an official recipient of
up-to-date, clean data if
On 11 May 2017 at 23:25, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Link to discussion so far on imports@:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-May/004956.html
>
>> My concern would be from where to they get their geocoding. Most
>> businesses, and particularly chain
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 355,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9055/
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM?
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages
11 matches
Mail list logo