Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] February Meeting

Let's go back to The BUll On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote: > I'll be there this month:-) > > A look back at previous emails threw up the following list: > > - The gunmakers arms. Just round the corner from the bull. (seems to have > it's own micro

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Conflator

Many thanks for this. I shall add some clarifying remarks to the post. Best, Rob On 31 Jan 2018 8:06 a.m., "Ilya Zverev" wrote: > I wrote up part 1 of my experience with OSM Conflator and the Community Validation tool. This first part focuses on OSM Conflator explaining what

Re: [Talk-GB] Errors in Street Names in Addresses

On 31/01/2018 09:07, Mark Goodge wrote: Which is the more correct usage here? Do we a) tag the dependent street as the addr:street, and the main street as addr:parentstreet, or should we b) (following Royal Mail practice as found in the PAF), tag the dependent street as a addr:substreet and

Re: [Talk-GB] Errors in Street Names in Addresses

On 31/01/18 09:07, Mark Goodge wrote: On 27/01/2018 20:09, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: Secondly, some addresses contain two street names, a main street and a so-called "dependent street". Apart from the historic anomalies, a single postcode should only cover one main street, but can

Re: [Talk-GB] Errors in Street Names in Addresses

On 27/01/2018 20:09, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: Secondly, some addresses contain two street names, a main street and a so-called "dependent street". Apart from the historic anomalies, a single postcode should only cover one main street, but can include more than one dependent street.

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Conflator

> I wrote up part 1 of my experience with OSM Conflator and the Community > Validation tool. This first part focuses on OSM Conflator explaining what it > does and the main components of it. > > http://www.mappa-mercia.org/2018/01/osm-conflator.html Thank you Rob, I enjoyed reading your post.