> On 7 Aug 2018, at 10:53, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> Philip Barnes wrote:
>> Recently new blue branded co-op shops have started to appear,
>> some have changed and at least one has opened in direct
>> competition with an existing Mid-counties.
>
> Midcounties are also adopting the "new"
It should be noted that many pharmacies appear in FHRS data, often with
"Exempt" status.
Jerry
On 6 August 2018 at 23:08, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 August 2018 at 09:39, Philip Withnall wrote:
> > Thanks for the updates! A quick question about
On 7 August 2018 10:53:10 BST, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
>Midcounties are also adopting the "new" cloverleaf Co-op logo in many
>places
I have spotted this logo on the Mid-counties co-op on the Welshpool road, from
memory it is green.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Android device
Philip Barnes wrote:
> Recently new blue branded co-op shops have started to appear,
> some have changed and at least one has opened in direct
> competition with an existing Mid-counties.
Midcounties are also adopting the "new" cloverleaf Co-op logo in many
places, while their Chipping Norton
I have recently been thinking we should be tagging co-op shops with the
operator tag.
Until recently I had seen it as a geographical thing, ie. It is in Shropshire
so it must be a mid-counties. Mid-counties use the same green branding that
Central England use in Leicestershire.
Recently new
Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> Perhaps an operator=* tag would help, if we knew which
> Co-Op groups still had pharmacies...
A quick flick through their various websites suggests only:
Midcounties: https://www.midcounties.coop/stores/
Lincolnshire:
> On 6 Aug 2018, at 12:04, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> (It looks like the East of England Co-op also operates a few pharmacies. I
> haven't investigated further.)
>
To confirm East of England Co-op do have their own brand pharmacies.
https://www.eastofengland.coop/pharmacy
Shaun
On 6 August 2018 at 09:39, Philip Withnall wrote:
> Thanks for the updates! A quick question about pharmacy matching: are
> we supposed to add the GPhC registration number of the pharmacy to its
> node/way in OSM, similarly to how we do FHRS IDs? There seems to be no
> guidance for/against this
On 6 August 2018 at 12:04, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
>> First there's a new set of objects in my "Ghosts" tool at
>> https://osm.mathmos.net/ghosts/. There are 162 still-mapped
>> "Co-Op Pharmacy" branches, which should have been rebranded
>> to become "Well
Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> First there's a new set of objects in my "Ghosts" tool at
> https://osm.mathmos.net/ghosts/. There are 162 still-mapped
> "Co-Op Pharmacy" branches, which should have been rebranded
> to become "Well Pharmacy" branches now.
Not necessarily!
As you say,
On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 08:01 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> A couple of updates to my tools that you might be interested in:
>
> First there's a new set of objects in my "Ghosts" tool at
> https://osm.mathmos.net/ghosts/. There are 162 still-mapped "Co-Op
> Pharmacy" branches, which
A couple of updates to my tools that you might be interested in:
First there's a new set of objects in my "Ghosts" tool at
https://osm.mathmos.net/ghosts/. There are 162 still-mapped "Co-Op
Pharmacy" branches, which should have been rebranded to become "Well
Pharmacy" branches now. Thanks to
12 matches
Mail list logo
