On 15/07/2015, Gill Weyman wrote:
> Hello,Please can you remove me from OSM discussions.Many thanks.Gill
You need to do this yourself, click on the link at the bottom of each
email (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie) at you have
an "unsubscribe" option at the bottom.
_
Hello,Please can you remove me from OSM discussions.Many thanks.Gill
Gill Weyman
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:51:42 +0100
> From: davecor...@gmail.com
> To: talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Eircode Next steps?
>
> The size of those polygons would be
On 14 July 2015 22:51:42 GMT+01:00, Dave Corley wrote:
>The size of those polygons would be too large to be of much use to
>anyone for anything I fear.
The routing key alone can in theory help uniquify an adress, but I dont know
how often that's true.
>I had a play around on the eircode site
The size of those polygons would be too large to be of much use to anyone
for anything I fear.
I had a play around on the eircode site tonight and it's honestly going to
be a mess to ever make use of the data especially when it comes to
apartment buildings where you will have dozens of Eircodes in
On 14 July 2015 18:47:21 GMT+01:00, Colm Moore wrote:
>> addr:county doesn't seem to be used a lot (only ~600 according to
>> taginfo).
>
>I think part of the reason addr:county (646) is populated so little
>compared to addr:city (20404) is that there is a field presented for
>city, but not cou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/07/15 14:49, Colm Moore wrote:
> It would be useful if fields for post code and county could be
> added.
I've submitted a patch/pull request to add the postcode/eircode to iD.
addr:county doesn't seem to be used a lot (only ~600 according to
tag
