Re: [Talk-us] US-based Server

2009-10-21 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Adam Schreiber wrote: I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror. The database ought to move to being on more than one server. I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or failing that, segmentation of our data. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail

Re: [Talk-us] proposal for deletion: talk-us-ga and

2009-10-21 Thread Sarah Manley
What is the status of the forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org? Would building this out more maybe solve some of our problems? In my current role, we tend us to use forums on our wikis more than mailing lists, and I know that wikipedia moved away from mailing lists as they grew. I am not

Re: [Talk-us] proposal for deletion: talk-us-ga and

2009-10-21 Thread Dave Hansen
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:40 -0400, Richard Weait wrote: On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Sarah Manley sarah.m.man...@gmail.com wrote: What is the status of the forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org? Would building this out more maybe solve some of our problems? Preference for email vs

Re: [Talk-us] US-based Server

2009-10-21 Thread Adam Schreiber
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, Adam Schreiber wrote: I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror.  The database ought to move to being on more than one server. I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or failing

Re: [Talk-us] US-based Server

2009-10-21 Thread Dave Hansen
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 01:34 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: Adam Schreiber wrote: I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror. The database ought to move to being on more than one server. I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or failing that, segmentation

Re: [Talk-us] US-based Server

2009-10-21 Thread Frederik Ramm
Adam, Adam Schreiber wrote: I'm sorry that I'm not a database engineer. I would think that some kind of block or re-direct could be made to the server responsible for the segment of the planet allotted to it. That would be the segmentation route. Certainly possible (having many regions in

Re: [Talk-us] US-based Server

2009-10-21 Thread Dale Puch
Not a network or SQL engineer. But a google search turned up this. http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/feature.html From the mailing list I see the code is up to 1.9 even if the page isn't updated. There also seemed like several basic configurations that can be used with different good and

Re: [Talk-us] US-based Server

2009-10-21 Thread Richard Welty
On 10/21/09 8:32 PM, Adam Schreiber wrote: I'm sorry to dissappoint. I thought it was a solved problem what with all of Google's products, DNS fail over and load balancing being common? in all cases, they've done application and infrastructure design to account for the difficulties.

Re: [Talk-us] US-based Server

2009-10-21 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, Adam Schreiber wrote: I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror.  The database ought to move to being on more than one server. I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or failing

Re: [Talk-us] US-based Server

2009-10-21 Thread Richard Welty
On 10/21/09 9:16 PM, Anthony wrote: What about a segmentation in time? During the time of day when most edits are being made from one part of the globe, make the server located there the read-write master, and the other(s) the read-only slave(s). you'd have to accept a blackout period

Re: [Talk-us] US Chapter Call?

2009-10-21 Thread Bill Ricker
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Sarah Manley sarah.m.man...@gmail.com wrote: Agreed that call a call during business hours will be difficult for a lot of people to attend. To be fair then, should we try for a saturday? Thanks Sara, Kate -- that should help people *feel* included, even if they

<    1   2   3