Hi,
Adam Schreiber wrote:
I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror. The database
ought to move to being on more than one server.
I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or
failing that, segmentation of our data.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail
What is the status of the forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org?
Would building this out more maybe solve some of our problems? In my current
role, we tend us to use forums on our wikis more than mailing lists, and I
know that wikipedia moved away from mailing lists as they grew. I am not
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:40 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Sarah Manley sarah.m.man...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is the status of the forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org?
Would building this out more maybe solve some of our problems?
Preference for email vs
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Adam Schreiber wrote:
I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror. The database
ought to move to being on more than one server.
I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or failing
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 01:34 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Adam Schreiber wrote:
I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror. The database
ought to move to being on more than one server.
I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or
failing that, segmentation
Adam,
Adam Schreiber wrote:
I'm sorry that I'm not a database engineer. I would think that some
kind of block or re-direct could be made to the server responsible for
the segment of the planet allotted to it.
That would be the segmentation route. Certainly possible (having many
regions in
Not a network or SQL engineer. But a google search turned up this.
http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/feature.html From the mailing list
I see the code is up to 1.9 even if the page isn't updated.
There also seemed like several basic configurations that can be used with
different good and
On 10/21/09 8:32 PM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
I'm sorry to dissappoint. I thought it was a solved problem what with
all of Google's products, DNS fail over and load balancing being
common?
in all cases, they've done application and infrastructure design to
account for the
difficulties.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Adam Schreiber wrote:
I would hope that and in the future a mapping mirror. The database
ought to move to being on more than one server.
I am interested to hear your proposals on conflict resolution, or
failing
On 10/21/09 9:16 PM, Anthony wrote:
What about a segmentation in time? During the time of day when most
edits are being made from one part of the globe, make the server
located there the read-write master, and the other(s) the read-only
slave(s).
you'd have to accept a blackout period
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Sarah Manley sarah.m.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed that call a call during business hours will be difficult for a lot of
people to attend. To be fair then, should we try for a saturday?
Thanks Sara, Kate -- that should help people *feel* included, even if
they
201 - 211 of 211 matches
Mail list logo